The U.S. Soybean Export Council (USSEC) organised Soy Connext 2026 at the Hyatt Regency, Chicago, bringing together more than 800 participants from 60 plus countries around the globe from animal nutrition, feed, food and agribusiness sectors. The flagship summit provided an important platform for international collaboration, market intelligence, sustainability, innovation and discussions on strengthening global food, feed and nutritional security. The program also included interactions with U.S. soybean growers, farm visits in Illinois and States, USA, the Soy Excellence Center (SEC) 2026 Top Achiever Recognition Award Ceremony, a Risk Management and Market Awareness Workshop and a technical visit to Kent Feed Mills, Iowa State University.

Strong Representation from Middle East, North Africa and South Asia (MENASA) Region at Soy Connext 2026
The delegation from Indian was led by Mr. Franklin Manuel, India Market Lead, U.S. Soybean Export Council (USSEC) and included Mr. Sanjeev Asthana, CEO, Patanjali Group and President, The Solvent Extractors’ Association of India; Mr. Angshu Mallick, Executive Deputy Chairman, Adani Wilmar Agri Business Limited, Mr. B. V. Mehta, Ms. Garima Jain, Mr. Vidya Bhushan, Mr. Kanubhai Thakkar, Mr. Kedar Kulkarni, Mr. Vinod Kumar Jain, Mr. Saurabh Singh Mehta, Mr. Pradeep Krishna, Mr. Rishan and Mr. Ricky Thaper.

As part of the program, the delegation visited Jeff O’Conner Farm in Illinois State and interacted with Mr. Jeff O’Conner, a sixth-generation soybean grower and Board Director of the Illinois Soybean Association. The visit provided valuable insights into sustainable soybean production, advanced genetics, precision agriculture, technology adoption and environmental stewardship.

Interactions with members of the Illinois Soybean Association during the Illinois Soy Reception further highlighted the importance of farmer-led institutions, strategic planning and public-private partnerships in developing a resilient soybean value chain.
The Soy Excellence Center (SEC) 2026 Top Achiever Recognition Award Ceremony was another important highlight of the program. Ms. Anne Meis, Chair, SEC Global Advisory Panel (GAP) welcomed participants, followed by remarks from Mr. Brent Swart, SEC GAP Secretary, and Mr. Mike McCranie, USSEC Chair.
Mr. Brent Swart presented the Impact Subcommittee Report, while Mr. Joel Schreurs, SEC GAP Treasurer, presented the Finance Subcommittee Report. Mr. Brent Babb, Executive Director, Soy Excellence Center, provided an update on SEC’s growing global footprint. Regional updates from the Americas, Asia, China, India, Nigeria and MENA demonstrated SEC’s contribution towards professional capacity building across the global protein value chain.

A proud moment for India came when Dr. Vijay Anand E. Pilli, Center Lead, Soy Excellence Center–India, highlighted the achievements of the SEC -India.
The STAR Award was presented to Dr. Pragati Salutgi in recognition of her outstanding contribution. Mr. Jim Sutter, CEO, USSEC appreciated the contributions of SEC Global Advisory Panel and Regional Advisory Council Members.

I feel truly honoured to serve as a Regional Advisory Council Member – India of the Soy Excellence Center – SEC India, an outstanding initiative of U.S. Soybean Export Council (USSEC). Over the years, SEC has played a transformative role in upskilling professionals across the livestock, feed, aquaculture and food sectors, thereby strengthening the global protein value chain. A heartfelt thank you to Soy Excellence Center and U.S. Soybean Export Council (USSEC) entire teams for their unwavering dedication and visionary leadership in investing in people – the most valuable asset for the future of poultry, dairy, aqua and food industry.

During a special media interaction attended by more than 20 international journalists, Mr. Mike McCranie, Chair, USSEC Board of Directors shared the perspective of U.S. soybean farmers and while reflecting on life as a soybean farmer, he shared a powerful thought “We love to produce crops and watch them grow. But what we really love is seeing our crops feed people around the

world. That is, without question, the most gratifying part of being a farmer.” His words beautifully captured the true purpose of agriculture—feeding the world.

Mr. Jim Sutter, CEO, USSEC, emphasized that Soy Connext 2026 with 800 plus registrations is more than a conference—it is a global platform for collaboration, innovation and sharing scientific insights. Mr. Sutter highlighted that U.S. Soy combines superior feed performance, verified sustainability and a highly reliable supply chain, positioning it to meet the world’s growing demand for protein. With global soybean import demand projected to rise significantly and a record U.S. soybean crop expected this year, the outlook for U.S. Soy remains exceptionally strong. Mr. Jim Sutter added U.S. Soy supply chain is backed by highway, rail, river and barge logistics that buffer supply when a buyer needs it, we deliver it. The world needs more protein and more oil for decades to come and U.S. Soy delivers both reliably, sustainably and at a value buyers can trust.

Post Media interaction, I had Insightful discussions with Mr. Kevin Roepke, Executive Director, USSEC – Middle East, North Africa & South Asia (MENASA), highlighted that SoyConnext2026 once again demonstrated U.S. Soy leadership in enabling sustainable food and feed systems worldwide. Mr. Kevin Roepke added Soy Connext has established itself as the world’s premier globally recognized soy event. Every year, it gets bigger and better and we are proud to see that this year we had over 800 participants join us from across the world. Apart from the stellar agenda and amazing speaker line-up, this conference also gives us the opportunity to network with the industry veterans, customers, U.S. soybean farmers, USSEC members and more. It represents what USSEC stands for: strengthening partnerships, fostering relations and building a preference for U.S. Soy across the world. These in person engagements build trust, emphasize the importance of supply chain resilience. Insatiable demand for both protein and oil is setting an exciting stage for the conversations and discussions being held. To that end, U.S. Soy plays a pivotal role in improving nutrition security across the world, while doing so in an environmentally sustainable and responsible manner.

Mr. Franklin Manuel, India Market Lead, USSEC described the engagement as a truly rewarding experience, emphasizing that the high-level interactions strengthened understanding and relationships across the U.S.–India soy value chain. The discussions opened new avenues for trade, innovation, sustainability and market development, while creating a stronger foundation for future soy cooperation and advocacy.

Mr. Sanjeev Asthana, CEO, Patanjali Group and President, The Solvent Extractors’ Association of India appreciated the depth of discussions at Soy Connext 2026, noting that the event brought critical issues around trade, agriculture and protein to the forefront. He emphasized that the Indian crushing and animal protein industries have valuable lessons to draw from global trends shaping the future of business.

Mr. Angshu Mallick, Executive Deputy Chairman, Adani Wilmar Agri Business Limited, highlighted the opportunity to interact with delegates from across the world and observe how the global soybean industry is increasingly focused on sustainability and critical role of soybeans in food and feed systems.

Mr. Pradeep Krishna, Executive Director, SKM Animal Feeds & Foods (India) Pvt Ltd., said Events like Soy Connext 2026 create meaningful platforms for dialogue, strengthen relationships across the value chain and open pathways for long-term collaboration. During networking reception my discussions with farmer leaders from American Soybean Association (ASA), United Soybean Board (USB) and U.S. Soybean Export Council (USSEC), reinforced one key message: international collaboration is essential to building resilient, sustainable and nutrition-focused food systems.

Global Leaders Share Perspectives on the Future of Soy during Soy Connext 2026 Conference

Soy Connext 2026 – Where Bright Minds Connect, commenced with welcome and opening remarks by Mr. Mike McCranie, Chair, USSEC Board of Directors.

Ms. Colby P., Executive Director, International Strategy, USSEC, introduced Ms. Michelle Caruso-Cabrera, CEO, MCC Global Enterprises, CNBC Contributor, who spoke on “Global Forces at Play: Geopolitics, Trade & the Future of Soy.”

Mr. Tanner Ehmke, Lead Economist, CoBank, presented “The Global Soy Outlook: Supply, Demand & Market Signals.” A panel on “How It’s Growing: Inside the 2026 U.S. Soy Crop” featured Mr. Mike McCranie; Mr. Randy Miller, Director, USSEC; Mr. J. L. Scott Metzger, President, American Soybean Association; and Mr. Brent Gatton, Chair, United Soybean Board.

On the last day of Soy Connext 2026, Mr. Daniel Whitley, Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service, USDA, addressed the delegates, followed by Mr. Juan Luciano, CEO, ADM, who highlighted the importance of an integrated soy value chain covering origination, processing, logistics and merchandising. This was followed by break-out session and there were insightful presentations from other distinguished leaders across the global soy value chain.

The summit concluded with remarks by Mr. Jim Sutter, CEO, USSEC, who emphasised the value of bringing U.S. soybean farmers, processors, traders, agribusinesses and international trade teams together to exchange knowledge and explore new opportunities. Mr. Sutter said attendees will depart with a clear perspective on the opportunities ahead and a look forward to what’s next. Mr. Sutter announced that Soy Connext 2027 will be held in New York, USA, from August 16–18, 2027.

Soy Connext 2026 was sponsored by several associations and companies; Illinois Soybean

Association, Indiana Soybean Alliance, Iowa Soybean Association, Ohio Soybean Council and South Dakota Soybean Council were the Platinum Sponsors. Cargill, Frey, The Delong Company, Nebraska Soybean Board, SOYLEIC and The Russell Marine Group were the Gold Sponsors. Kansas Soybean Association, Kentucky Soybean Board, North Dakota Soybean Council, Northern Soy, Tennessee Soybean Promotion Board and Wisconsin Soybean Marketing Board were the Silver Sponsors and SGS, Blue Grass Farms of Ohio Inc., CHS Inc., Insta-Pro International, US Identity Preserved

Alliance, International Feed Corporation, ADM, AGP, Arkansas Soybean Promotion Board, Bunge, Consolidated Grain & Barge, Fornazor, Hawkeye Gold Lcc, Minnesota Soybean Research, Perdue Agribusiness LLC, Poet, Ray-Mont Logistics America, Stone Arch Commodities, The Scoular Company, Trans Globe, US Nisshin Shokai Inc., Wheaton Grain Inc., were the Bronze Sponsors of Soy Connext 2026.

Market Intelligence and Risk Management
Following Soy Connext, the USSEC MENASA Trade Team participated in a “Risk Management and Market Awareness” Workshop on August 8 at the Hyatt Regency, Chicago.

Mr. Kevin Roepke, Executive Director, USSEC–MENASA, welcomed participants from the Middle East, North Africa and South Asia and introduced Mr. Guy H. Allen, Senior Economist.The workshop covered global agricultural commodity markets, soybean trade dynamics, supply-demand fundamentals, price discovery, market volatility, forecasting and practical risk-management strategies.

For India’s poultry, livestock, dairy and aquaculture sectors, such knowledge is increasingly important for managing feed ingredient availability, price fluctuations and long-term feed security.

From Iowa Soybean Fields to Feed Technology
Post conference, the delegation visited Grubbs Lands & Cattle Farm in Iowa State, and had good interaction with Mr. Brock Grubbs, a sixth-generation farmer producing soybean and corn across approximately 4,200 acres. The visit provided insights into precision agriculture, advanced genetics, technology and sustainable farming. Ms. Karen Long, Project Coordinator, Iowa Soybean Association, briefed the delegation on farming and sustainability practices.

Later the Trade Team visited the Kent Feed Mill and Grain Science Complex at Iowa State University, a modern facility integrating education, research, analytical laboratories and pilot-scale feed manufacturing. Dr. Dirk Maier, Professor and Director, Kent Feed Mill and Grain Science Complex, Dr. Camille Schroeder, Associate Director and Mr. A S M Younus Bhuiyan Sabbir, Assistant Manager of Grain Center, briefed the delegation on advancements in feed technology, grain science, research and industry-academia collaboration.

Strengthening U.S.–South Asia Partnerships
Thanks to Mr. Kevin Roepke, Executive Director (MENASA), U.S. Soybean Export Council, Mr. Franklin Manuel, India Market Lead, USSEC Ms. Deeba Giannoulis, Regional Food and Nutritional Security & Trade Strategy Leader–MENASA, Ms. Hibah Ameer, Regional Communications Lead–MENASA, Dr. Vijay Anand E. Pilli, Dr. Ashesh Bhattarai, Nepal Market Lead, Mr. Saram Bokhari, Pakistan Market Lead, Mr. KhaBiBur RahMan, Bangladesh Market Lead, Dr. Khurram Shahbaz, Regional Special Projects Facilitator, South Asia, Ms. Nikita Sharma, PMP, Ms. Dhanu Basavraj, Mr. Tara Singh Rawat, and all other members of the USSEC team for organizing this highly educational and informative program and for providing members of the MENASATrade Team with this valuable learning opportunity. Initiatives like these play a vital role in enhancing industry knowledge, strengthening international partnerships, and fostering sustainable growth across the global agricultural and animal protein sectors.

From soybean farms in Illinois and Iowa States to global

discussions during Soy Connext 2026 in Chicago and advanced feed and grain research visit at Iowa State University, offered valuable insights into the U.S. soybean value chain.

As India, the United States and other countries work to meet the growing global demand for affordable and nutritious protein, collaboration in feed security, technology, sustainability, research and trade can play an important role. The journey through the U.S. soybean and feed ecosystem therefore offered much more than an understanding of American agriculture. It provided a broader perspective on how innovation, farmer leadership, scientific research, market intelligence and international cooperation can come together to build more resilient, competitive and sustainable food and feed systems for the future.

PL Agro Technologies Pvt. Ltd. is Now ZAGRO India Pvt. Ltd.

Strengthening the ZAGRO Group’s Commitment to Animal Health, Animal Nutrition and Crop Care in India

Chennai, India — July 2, 2026

PL Agro Technologies Pvt. Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of ZAGRO Singapore Pte. Ltd., has officially rebranded as ZAGRO India Pvt. Ltd. The change deepens the company’s integration with the ZAGRO Group — a global provider of Animal Health, Animal Nutrition, Crop Care, Public Health, and Industrial Chemicals with over 70 years of international experience.

The new identity aligns the Indian business with ZAGRO’s global brand, giving customers access to stronger R&D, global manufacturing standards, and a broader product portfolio — while preserving the same trusted relationships, service, and quality customers rely on today.

Investing in India’s Growth

India remains one of the world’s fastest-growing agricultural and livestock markets. As ZAGRO India, the company is expanding across three core segments:

• Animal Nutrition — vitamin & mineral premixes, specialty feed additives, toxin binders, functional nutrition solutions
• Animal Health — poultry, swine, dairy and aquaculture solutions, plus farm biosecurity programs
• Crop Care — crop protection, plant nutrition, specialty agri-chemicals, and sustainable production technologies

The company continues to invest in its Chennai, Tamil Nadu manufacturing facility and technical teams, maintaining stringent international quality standards while tailoring solutions to local farming conditions.

A Message from Management

“This transition represents far more than a name change. It reflects our commitment to becoming an even stronger partner for Indian agriculture by leveraging ZAGRO’s global expertise, innovation, and quality standards — delivering solutions that improve animal health, farm productivity, and sustainable agriculture across India.”

 What Stays the Same

• Ownership under the ZAGRO Group
• Existing contracts, commitments, and customer relationships
• Product quality and service standards
• Our experienced management and technical teams

Looking Ahead

With the full strength of the ZAGRO Group behind it, Zagro India is positioned to become a leading provider of integrated animal health, animal nutrition, and crop care solutions — supporting poultry, dairy, beef cattle, swine, aquaculture, companion animal, and crop production customers nationwide with technical consultancy, product support, and training.

About ZAGRO India Pvt. Ltd. A wholly owned subsidiary of ZAGRO Singapore Pte. Ltd., ZAGRO India delivers innovative Animal Nutrition, Animal Health, and Crop Care solutions, combining global expertise with local market knowledge to enhance livestock productivity, crop performance, and sustainable agriculture.

About ZAGRO Singapore Established in 1953, ZAGRO Singapore Pte. Ltd. is a leading agribusiness group operating in over 70 countries, developing, manufacturing, and marketing Animal Health, Animal Nutrition, Crop Care, Public Health, and Industrial Chemical products worldwide.

Contact
ZAGRO India Pvt. Ltd.
(Formerly PL Agro Technologies Ltd.)
Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Manas Mitra, Commercial Head -India
manas.mitra@zagro.com
Website: www.zagro.com

A Positive Step Towards Ease of Doing Business in Poultry – Ranpal Dhanda, President, Poultry Federation of India

Government officials and poultry sector representatives during the productive meeting

It was a privilege for the Poultry Federation of India delegation, led by PFI President Mr. Ranpal Dhanda, to meet Shri Mahipal Dhanda, Hon’ble Education Minister, Govt. of Haryana, to discuss key issues impacting the growth and development of the poultry sector in the state.

PFI Team extends the sincere gratitude to Hon’ble Minister Shri Mahipal Dhanda Ji for his proactive support and for facilitating a high-level meeting with Mr. Anurag Rastogi (IAS) Chief Secretary, Government of Haryana and other senior officials Mr. Arun Kumar Gupta, Principal Secretary to Chief Minister, Mr. Vinay Kumar, Chairman, Pollution Control Board and Dr. Prem Singh, Director, Animal Husbandry, Government of Haryana.

The delegation highlighted Haryana’s vital contribution to India’s poultry industry and submitted several recommendations aimed at improving the ease of doing business for poultry farmers. Poultry Federation of India Team is pleased that the Hon’ble Chief Secretary responded positively and directed the concerned departments to take action on several important reforms, including:
Simplification of Pollution Control Board guidelines for poultry farms.
Removal of Market Committee Fee on maize and bajra procured from other states, with an assurance of resolution within 10–15 days.
Exemption from Change of Land Use (CLU) requirements for poultry farms.
Promotion of egg consumption through the Sports Department and other government departments.
Formation of a Poultry Development Committee with representation from the poultry industry to strengthen policy formulation and address sectoral challenges.

Speaking on the occasion, Mr. Ranpal Dhanda, President, Poultry Federation of India, expressed gratitude to the Hon’ble Education Minister, the Hon’ble Chief Secretary, Principal Secretary, Director Animal Husbandry and other Government officials for their positive and constructive approach. These initiatives will reduce unnecessary regulatory hurdles, improve the ease of doing business, encourage investment, create employment opportunities, and further strengthen Haryana’s poultry sector.

The Poultry Federation of India looks forward to working closely with the Government of Haryana to translate these commitments into meaningful reforms that will benefit poultry farmers and contribute to the sustainable growth of one of the state’s most important agricultural sectors. Together, we are building a stronger, more progressive, and farmer-friendly poultry industry.

The 27th edition of World Poultry Congress (WPC) 2026 organised by the World’s Poultry Science Association (WPSA) at the Metro Toronto Convention Centre, Toronto, Canada, from July 13–17, 2026 was recognised as the world’s premier gathering for poultry science and technology, WPC 2026 had brought together a good delegates comprising poultry scientists, researchers, academicians, veterinarians, industry leaders, production specialists, policymakers, and students from more than 85 countries. The congress served as an exceptional platform for exchanging knowledge, showcasing cutting-edge innovations and strengthening international collaborations that will shape the future of the poultry industry.

The scientific and technical program covered a wide spectrum of critical topics including genetics and breeding, poultry nutrition, health and disease prevention, animal welfare, sustainability, precision production technologies, processing innovations and global food security. At a time when the poultry sector is addressing evolving challenges related to disease management, climate resilience, sustainability and feeding a growing global population, forums like WPC continue to play a pivotal role in driving science-based solutions and technological advancement.

Held once every four years under the auspices of the World’s Poultry Science Association (WPSA), the World Poultry Congress remains one of the most influential international platforms dedicated to advancing poultry science and industry worldwide.

The success of WPC 2026 was made possible through the support of leading global organizations, including Elanco and Cargill Animal Nutrition and Health as Platinum Sponsors, Merck Animal Health and Zoetis as Gold Sponsors, Anitox, Evonik, Novus International, Inc, Huvepharma; Trouw Nutrition, Novonesis Animal Health and Nutrition, Nor-Feed, Insighter Biotechnology, JBT Marel, Adisseo, Jefo Biotechnology, Olmix Biotechnology Research and Vtagro as Bronze Sponsors and was supported by Jamesway, Hendrix Genetics Layers, Egg Farmers of Canada, Chicken Farmers of Canada, Turkey Farmers of Canada, Canadian Hatching Egg Producers, Alternative Design Manufacturing and Suply, Inc., Allix3, US-RSPE, JRS Livestock Applications and Hy-line International. WPC-2016 was further supported by esteemed media partners including Canadian Poultry Magazine, WATT Poultry, Agri Insight, Poultry Creations, Gulf Poultry, Modern Poultry, and aviNews International.

The exhibitors displayed their promotional material in Exhibit Hall and the seminars / presentations were in various session rooms. The poster and oral presentation sessions represented the cutting edge of global poultry research. Forty plus speakers from six continents, hundreds of abstracts across every major area of poultry science. During World Poultry Congress 2026, it was my privilege to meet distinguished poultry leaders, scientists, researchers, innovators and industry colleagues from around the world and explored new opportunities for collaboration that will contribute to the sustainable growth and future of the global poultry sector.

My sincere congratulations to the World’s Poultry Science Association (WPSA), the organising committee, sponsors, exhibitors, and everyone who worked tirelessly to make WPC 2026 an outstanding success.As one memorable chapter comes to an end, we now look forward to the 28th World Poultry Congress, which will be held in Tokyo, Japan, from July 21–25, 2030.

Moisture Optimization and Mold Control:
An Integrated Approach to Improving Feed Quality,
Shelf Life, and Feed Mill Profitability in Tropical Climates

Dr. Maloshrie Bora, Senior Program Manager – Feed Safety, Trouw Nutrition South Asia

Across India and South Asia, feed manufacturers today face a common challenge: producing safe, stable, high-quality feed while navigating increasingly variable climate conditions, fluctuating raw material quality, rising production costs, and greater demands for feed efficiency.

Among the many factors that influence feed quality, moisture management remains one of the most underestimated. Yet moisture directly impacts pellet quality, nutrient preservation, feed hygiene, shelf life, production throughput, and overall profitability. Improper moisture management can result in shrinkage, spoilage, mold proliferation, nutrient losses, increased fines, and reduced mill efficiency. Conversely, optimized moisture control can generate significant economic returns while improving feed quality throughout the supply chain.

The Hidden Economics of Moisture Loss
During feed manufacturing, moisture is lost at several stages, including grinding, conditioning, pelleting, cooling, storage, and transportation. Industry observations indicate that feed mills can lose between 0.5% and 1.5% moisture during production, resulting in direct shrinkage and reduced profitability. A feed mill producing 500 tonnes per day can lose approximately 5 tonnes of saleable product for every 1% moisture reduction. In an industry where margins are constantly under pressure, minimizing process losses represents a substantial opportunity for value creation.

Why Adding Water Alone Does Not Solve the Problem
A common industry practice for compensating moisture losses is the addition of water during feed processing. While this may appear straightforward, water possesses high surface tension and does not distribute uniformly throughout the feed matrix. Instead, free moisture often remains on the surface of feed particles, increasing water activity and creating favourable conditions for microbial growth. The challenge for the modern feed industry is therefore not simply increasing moisture content, but ensuring moisture is effectively distributed and retained throughout the feed while maintaining microbial stability.

Mold Growth: A Feed Quality and Profitability Threat
Molds are among the most significant biological threats to feed quality. Beyond visible spoilage, molds consume valuable nutrients, reduce energy content, affect feed palatability, shorten storage life, and create conditions favourable for mycotoxin production. The economic implications can be significant. Raw materials often constitute up to 80% of total feed production costs. Any reduction in nutritional value, shelf life, or feed volume directly impacts both manufacturers and producers downstream.

Emerging Scientific Approaches to Mold Inhibition
Advances in feed preservation technology have moved beyond conventional organic acid applications. Modern solutions increasingly combine multiple modes of action to optimize efficacy under practical feed manufacturing conditions. These technologies typically integrate:
Organic acids
– Buffered acid systems
– Moisture management agents
– Surfactants and emulsifiers
– Synergistic bioactive compounds
Such approaches improve moisture distribution, enhance contact between active ingredients and microbial cells, and prolong preservation effectiveness throughout storage. This scientific evolution reflects the industry’s transition from simple preservation strategies toward integrated moisture and microbial management systems.

Commercial Validation: Integrating Moisture and Feed Hygiene
Research and commercial evaluations have demonstrated that moisture management and mold control must work together. In one reported study, the addition of plain water alone reduced feed shelf life by approximately 33%. However, when moisture was combined with an integrated mold inhibition program, shelf life improved compared to untreated feed while preserving feed quality and stability. Additional commercial applications have shown benefits including:
– Improved feed mill throughput
– Enhanced pellet durability
– Reduced reprocessed fines
– Better moisture retention
– Improved production efficiency
– Greater feed stability during storage
These findings highlight that effective moisture optimization depends on simultaneously managing microbial risks

A Modern Approach for South Asia
Recognizing the unique challenges faced by feed manufacturers in tropical climates, Trouw Nutrition has developed integrated solutions specifically designed to optimize moisture management and feed hygiene.

Among these solutions is the Fylax® portfolio, which combines organic acid technology, moisture management agents, surfactants, and the proprietary ActiProp® technology platform. The objective is to improve moisture distribution, enhance mold inhibition, preserve nutrient value, and support feed mill efficiency within a single integrated program. ActiProp® technology works by increasing mold cell wall permeability and improving access of active ingredients to microbial targets, resulting in enhanced preservation performance compared with conventional approaches. At the same time, moisture-management components facilitate more uniform distribution of moisture within the feed matrix, helping improve operational efficiency and shelf-life outcomes.

In today’s feed industry, moisture management can no longer be viewed simply as a processing parameter—it is a critical driver of feed quality, feed safety, and profitability. As feed manufacturers across India and South Asia face increasing challenges from humidity, raw material variability, and shelf-life pressures, an integrated approach that combines moisture optimization with effective mold control is becoming essential. By preserving nutrient value, reducing shrinkage, improving pellet quality, and enhancing microbial stability, modern feed hygiene solutions can help mills achieve greater operational efficiency while delivering safer, more consistent feed to livestock producers. Ultimately, successful feed preservation is not just about preventing spoilage—it is about maximizing value throughout the feed-to-food chain.

Introduction : Every year, invisible contaminants hidden within grains and feed ingredients silently reduce livestock productivity. Mycotoxins—naturally occurring toxic compounds produced by fungi—are responsible for millions of dollars in economic losses through poor growth, reduced immunity, reproductive disorders, lower feed efficiency, and increased mortality. Although impossible to see with the naked eye, their impact on poultry, swine, and dairy production is enormous.

What Are Mycotoxins?
Mycotoxins are toxic secondary metabolites produced by moulds such as Aspergillus, Fusarium, and Penicillium. Scientists have identified over 300 different mycotoxins, and studies indicate that nearly one-quarter of global feed supplies may be contaminated.
The most economically important toxins include:
-Aflatoxins
– Ochratoxins
– Fumonisins
– Deoxynivalenol (DON)
– T-2 Toxin
– Zearalenone
Each affects animals differently, but all reduce productivity and profitability.

Why Do Mycotoxins Develop?
Moulds flourish when four conditions come together:
– Warm temperatures
– High humidity
– Moisture in grains
– Oxygen
Once established, fungal growth continues during harvesting, storage, transportation, and feed manufacturing unless properly controlled.

India’s Mycotoxin Challenge
Recent testing presented in the report paints a worrying picture. 6,304 feed analysis, 99% contamination, and 83% above the performance-risk threshold.
Key Findings

– 6,304 feed analysis conducted
– 99% showed detectable contamination
– 83% exceeded performance-risk thresholds
Among ingredients, DORB, peanut meal, maize, soybean meal, DDGS, and corn gluten all showed significant contamination levels.

Multiple Mycotoxins: A Greater Threat
Animals are rarely exposed to a single toxin.
Instead, feeds commonly contain multiple mycotoxins that interact synergistically, making the combined damage significantly greater than the effect of individual toxins. This explains why even relatively low toxin concentrations can cause substantial production losses.

Economic Impact on Farms
The consequences are visible across every production system.

Poultry
– Lower feed intake
– Reduced weight gain
– Poor feed conversion
– Thin eggshells
– Lower hatchability
– Fatty liver
– Weak immunity

Swine
– Reproductive disorders
– Embryonic mortality
– Vomiting
– Reduced growth
– Feed refusal
– Tail necrosis
– Liver and kidney damage
Ultimately, these problems translate directly into economic losses through poorer animal performance.

The Hidden Cost: Immune Suppression
– One of the most damaging effects of mycotoxins is their ability to suppress the immune system.
– Animals become more vulnerable to bacterial and viral infections while showing reduced responses to vaccines and treatments.
– This means disease outbreaks become more severe and recovery becomes slower.

Can Nutrition Help?
Nutritional interventions can reduce the impact of toxins.

Recommended approaches include:
– Higher amino acid supplementation
– Vitamins E, C, and D3
– Selenium
– Choline chloride
– Liver-support products
– Mold inhibitors
– Broad-spectrum toxin binders
These measures improve resilience while reducing toxin damage.

Scientific Toxin Elimination Management (STEM-500)
An effective strategy combines four complementary actions:
1. Prevention
Prevent fungal growth before toxins develop.
2. Elimination
Bind multiple mycotoxins irreversibly.
3. Neutralization
Use enzymatic systems to neutralize toxins.
4. Gut Ecology Enhancement
Improve gut health while strengthening immunity and reducing pathogen pressure. This integrated approach offers broader protection than relying on toxin binders alone.

Featured Solution: STEM-500
The presentation introduces STEM-500, a multi-component toxin management product formulated with:
– Specially treated HSCAS
– Organic acids
– Oxine Copper
– MOS
– Bio-active phytocompounds
– Polyphenols
– Lactobacillus
– Lipotropic agents
According to the presentation, the product is designed to reduce mould growth, bind multiple mycotoxins, minimize endotoxin effects, improve liver function, support gut health, and enhance feed conversion, growth, and survival.

Conclusion
Mycotoxins remain one of the most significant hidden threats in modern animal production. Since contamination can occur throughout the grain supply chain, prevention alone is rarely sufficient. A comprehensive management strategy—combining mould control, toxin binding, detoxification, and gut health support—is essential for maintaining animal health and maximizing production efficiency.

Biosecurity as an Investment: Why Disease Prevention delivers the Best Return on Investment (ROI) in Poultry Production

Prof. (Dr.) P.K. Shukla and Dr. Amitav Bhattacharyya
Department of Poultry Science, College of Veterinary Science and
Animal Husbandry, Mathura- 281001 (U.P.)

Introduction
Over the last five decades, the poultry industry has undergone a remarkable transformation. Scientific advances in genetics, nutrition, housing, disease control, and management have enabled producers to achieve unprecedented levels of productivity. Poultry meat and eggs have become among the most affordable and nutritious sources of animal protein, making the industry indispensable for global food and nutritional security. In India, poultry production has developed into an important agribusiness sector, generating employment for millions of people while supporting allied industries such as hatcheries, feed manufacturing, pharmaceuticals, processing, transportation, and retail.

Despite these achievements, infectious diseases remain one of the greatest constraints to sustainable poultry production. Diseases such as avian influenza, Newcastle disease, infectious bronchitis, infectious bursal disease, Marek’s disease, coccidiosis, salmonellosis, and mycoplasmosis continue to cause substantial economic losses. These diseases not only reduce flock productivity but also affect food safety, consumer confidence, international trade, and public health.

Under modern intensive production systems, disease outbreaks spread rapidly because of high stocking densities, frequent movement of birds and equipment, and increasing interactions among farms. Once pathogens establish themselves within a flock, economic losses accumulate through mortality, reduced growth, poor feed conversion, lower egg production, treatment expenses, and market disruptions. Consequently, preventing disease introduction is far more economical than managing disease after it has occurred.

Biosecurity has therefore become the foundation of modern poultry health management. It is no longer viewed merely as a collection of hygiene practices but as a comprehensive risk management strategy designed to prevent disease while maximizing productivity and profitability.

Economic Impact of Poultry Diseases
The financial consequences of poultry diseases extend far beyond mortality alone. Disease outbreaks affect every component of the production chain, from breeder farms and hatcheries to processing plants, retailers, and consumers.

Direct economic losses include increased mortality, poor weight gain, reduced egg production, inferior feed conversion efficiency, decreased hatchability, veterinary expenses, medication costs, diagnostic testing, and emergency vaccination programmes. Even mild infections that do not cause obvious mortality often reduce flock performance sufficiently to eliminate expected profit margins.

Indirect losses are frequently even greater. Disease outbreaks can result in movement restrictions, export bans, lower consumer demand, reduced processing efficiency, insurance costs, and disruption of supply chains. Highly pathogenic avian influenza has repeatedly demonstrated how a single outbreak can result in massive financial losses through depopulation, compensation payments, and trade restrictions.
Equally damaging are the hidden costs associated with subclinical infections. Chronic disease reduces flock uniformity, suppresses immune responses, increases susceptibility to secondary infections, and diminishes reproductive performance without producing dramatic clinical signs. Such losses often remain unnoticed but continuously erode farm profitability.
These economic realities highlight an important principle: disease prevention should not be regarded solely as a veterinary responsibility but as an essential business strategy that protects investments in chicks, feed, labour, housing, equipment, and marketing.

Prevention Versus Treatment: The Economics of Biosecurity
The principle that “prevention is better than cure” has special relevance in commercial poultry production. Intensive poultry systems house thousands of genetically similar birds in close proximity, allowing infectious agents to spread extremely rapidly once introduced.

By the time clinical signs become evident, pathogens have often multiplied extensively within the flock and contaminated the surrounding environment. Even if treatment successfully controls mortality, birds rarely regain their original production potential. Reduced feed efficiency, slower growth, delayed marketing age, poor egg production, and increased susceptibility to secondary infections frequently persist throughout the production cycle.
Treatment also involves considerable expenditure on antibiotics, supportive medications, laboratory investigations, veterinary consultation, and labour. These costs are incurred after production losses have already begun, thereby reducing overall profitability.
Biosecurity interrupts pathogen transmission before infection becomes established. Investments in perimeter fencing, controlled farm access, sanitation, water treatment, pest management, employee training, and visitor control substantially reduce the probability of disease introduction. Unlike treatment costs, preventive investments continue generating economic returns throughout successive production cycles by maintaining flock health and preserving production efficiency.
Numerous studies have shown that the cost of implementing effective biosecurity programmes is significantly lower than the cumulative losses associated with disease outbreaks. Consequently, biosecurity functions as a form of biological insurance that safeguards every other investment made in poultry production.

Principles of Poultry Biosecurity
Biosecurity is a science-based management system aimed at preventing the introduction, establishment, and spread of infectious agents. Effective biosecurity requires an integrated approach involving infrastructure, operational procedures, personnel behaviour, environmental sanitation, and continuous monitoring.
Three fundamental principles form the basis of poultry biosecurity:

Bio-exclusion focuses on preventing pathogens from entering the farm through controlled access, procurement of healthy chicks, vehicle disinfection, quarantine, and visitor management.

Bio-containment prevents infectious agents from spreading outside infected premises by implementing movement restrictions, proper disposal of carcasses and litter, and thorough cleaning and disinfection.

Bio-management minimizes disease pressure within the farm through vaccination, optimal nutrition, environmental management, pest control, water sanitation, litter management, and animal welfare practices.

Farm design also plays an important role in disease prevention. Poultry farms should be located away from other commercial farms, live bird markets, and migratory bird habitats. Clearly defined clean and dirty zones, all-in/all-out production systems, and adequate downtime between flocks reduce pathogen survival and transmission.
Personnel hygiene is equally critical. Farm workers should use dedicated clothing and footwear, maintain hand hygiene, comply with visitor restrictions, and receive regular biosecurity training. Similarly, feed and water must be protected from contamination through proper storage, water chlorination, and routine quality monitoring.
Rodent and insect control programmes, together with scientifically approved mortality disposal methods, further strengthen disease prevention by eliminating important sources of pathogen transmission.

Biosecurity as a Strategic Business Investment
Historically, many poultry producers regarded expenditures on sanitation, fencing, disinfection equipment, employee training, and surveillance as unavoidable operating costs. Modern poultry enterprises increasingly recognize that these expenditures are investments that protect all other farm assets.

Feed represents nearly two-thirds of total production costs. Healthy birds utilize feed more efficiently, grow faster, produce more eggs, and require fewer medications than diseased birds. Even modest improvements in feed conversion ratio can substantially increase profitability.
Strong biosecurity systems also improve market confidence. Consumers increasingly demand poultry products that are safe, traceable, and produced under high standards of animal health and welfare. Farms maintaining effective biosecurity programmes are better positioned to comply with certification schemes, quality assurance standards, and export requirements.
From a business perspective, biosecurity reduces biological risk while improving enterprise resilience. Disease outbreaks can rapidly destroy years of investment in genetics, housing, labour, and marketing. Preventive biosecurity therefore serves as a protective framework that preserves productivity, enhances competitiveness, and ensures long-term sustainability.
Modern poultry producers should therefore ask not whether they can afford to invest in biosecurity, but whether they can afford the consequences of inadequate disease prevention.

Practical Biosecurity Measures that Enhance Profitability
The success of any biosecurity programme depends on its consistent implementation at the farm level. While sophisticated infrastructure and advanced technologies can strengthen disease prevention, many highly effective biosecurity interventions are simple, practical, and relatively inexpensive. Their value lies not in high capital investment but in disciplined and continuous application.

The first line of defence is strict farm access control. Entry to poultry houses should be restricted to essential personnel, and all visitors should comply with hygiene protocols including hand sanitization, use of dedicated clothing and boots, and passage through properly maintained footbaths. Maintaining visitor records and enforcing a minimum downtime for personnel who have recently visited other poultry farms significantly reduce the likelihood of introducing infectious pathogens.
Cleaning and disinfection remain the cornerstone of disease prevention. Poultry houses, equipment, feeders, drinkers, egg trays, transport crates, and vehicles should be thoroughly cleaned to remove organic matter before applying appropriate disinfectants. Adequate downtime between production cycles allows environmental pathogen loads to decline naturally and improves the effectiveness of sanitation programmes.
Feed and water hygiene are equally important because they represent continuous sources of pathogen exposure. Feed should be procured from reliable manufacturers and stored under dry, rodent-proof conditions to prevent fungal contamination and mycotoxin development.
Drinking water should be regularly tested for microbial quality, chlorinated when necessary, and supplied through cleaned pipelines to minimize biofilm formation.
Integrated pest management also plays a critical role. Rodents, flies, beetles, mosquitoes, and wild birds serve as mechanical carriers of numerous bacterial and viral pathogens. Effective pest control, combined with scientific carcass disposal methods such as composting, rendering, or incineration, minimizes environmental contamination and pathogen persistence.
Finally, employee education is perhaps the most cost-effective biosecurity investment. Every worker should understand disease transmission pathways, recognize early clinical signs, and consistently follow standard operating procedures (SOPs). A well-trained workforce transforms biosecurity from a written protocol into a daily management culture that protects flock health and farm profitability.

Digital Transformation of Poultry Biosecurity
Rapid advances in digital technologies are revolutionizing poultry health management by shifting disease control from a reactive to a predictive approach. Precision livestock farming integrates artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, sensor technologies, automation, and molecular diagnostics to improve disease surveillance and decision-making.

Artificial intelligence can analyse production data such as feed intake, water consumption, mortality, growth rate, and behavioural changes to detect early indicators of disease before clinical signs become apparent. Such predictive systems enable farmers to intervene promptly, thereby reducing mortality and economic losses.
The Internet of Things (IoT) has further strengthened biosecurity by enabling continuous monitoring of environmental variables including temperature, humidity, ammonia concentration, carbon dioxide, ventilation efficiency, and water quality. Automated alerts help managers respond immediately to deviations that may compromise bird health.
Computer vision systems are increasingly being used to monitor flock behaviour, feeding activity, movement patterns, and gait abnormalities. These technologies allow rapid identification of subtle behavioural changes associated with disease onset.
Molecular diagnostic tools such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), real-time PCR, and genomic sequencing permit rapid detection of viral, bacterial, and parasitic pathogens, facilitating timely intervention. Blockchain-based traceability systems and cloud-based farm management platforms further enhance transparency, certification, and supply chain confidence.
Although digital biosecurity requires initial investment, its long-term benefits include reduced disease incidence, improved productivity, lower veterinary costs, enhanced decision-making, and increased resilience against emerging diseases.

Biosecurity Challenges and Opportunities in India
India has become one of the world’s leading producers of poultry meat and eggs, yet the country’s diverse production systems create unique biosecurity challenges. Large integrated commercial operations coexist with smallholder and backyard poultry farms, creating epidemiological interfaces that facilitate pathogen transmission.

One of the major constraints is uneven awareness regarding the economic importance of biosecurity. Large poultry companies generally maintain comprehensive disease prevention programmes, whereas many small and medium-scale producers continue to regard biosecurity as an additional expense rather than a productive investment. Financial limitations often prevent investment in essential infrastructure such as perimeter fencing, vehicle disinfection facilities, controlled farm entry, and scientific carcass disposal systems.
High poultry density in several production clusters further increases disease risk. Frequent movement of day-old chicks, feed, eggs, live birds, and farm personnel across states facilitates pathogen dissemination. Backyard poultry, live bird markets, and mixed farming systems involving ducks and other livestock also increase the risk of zoonotic disease transmission.
Despite these challenges, India possesses significant opportunities to strengthen poultry biosecurity. The country has a strong network of veterinary universities, diagnostic laboratories, research institutes, extension agencies, and progressive poultry companies capable of promoting scientific disease prevention. Government initiatives supporting livestock health, antimicrobial stewardship, digital agriculture, and the One Health approach can further accelerate adoption of comprehensive biosecurity practices.
Public-private partnerships involving industry associations, academic institutions, pharmaceutical companies, and producer organizations will be instrumental in developing practical, affordable, and scalable biosecurity solutions for Indian poultry farmers.

Biosecurity within the One Health Framework
Modern biosecurity extends beyond farm profitability to encompass animal health, public health, and environmental sustainability. The One Health concept recognizes the close interdependence of humans, animals, and ecosystems.

Effective poultry biosecurity reduces the circulation of zoonotic pathogens such as avian influenza and Salmonella, thereby protecting consumers, farm workers, and surrounding communities. Healthy flocks also require fewer therapeutic antibiotics, contributing to global efforts to combat antimicrobial resistance (AMR).
Good biosecurity practices improve waste management, reduce contamination of soil and water resources, and minimize environmental dissemination of infectious agents. Consequently, investments in poultry biosecurity generate societal benefits that extend far beyond individual farms by supporting food safety, environmental protection, and national food security.

Capacity Building and Policy Support
Infrastructure alone cannot guarantee successful biosecurity. Human behaviour remains one of the most critical determinants of disease prevention. Continuous training programmes should therefore be provided for farm owners, managers, veterinarians, technicians, and workers on disease recognition, personal hygiene, vaccination, cleaning and disinfection, pest control, mortality management, and emergency response.
Routine biosecurity audits, risk assessments, and comprehensive record-keeping systems enable producers to monitor flock performance and identify weaknesses requiring corrective action. Standard operating procedures should be regularly reviewed and updated in response to emerging disease threats and technological developments.
Government agencies also have an essential role in strengthening national biosecurity through veterinary services, laboratory networks, surveillance systems, science-based regulations, and financial incentives that encourage producers to invest in preventive infrastructure. Harmonization of national standards with international guidelines will further improve India’s competitiveness in global poultry trade.

Way Forward
Biosecurity has evolved from a routine veterinary recommendation into one of the most valuable strategic investments in modern poultry production. Scientific evidence consistently demonstrates that prevention delivers substantially greater economic returns than treatment. Every investment made in disease prevention safeguards valuable biological assets, preserves productivity, reduces veterinary expenditure, minimizes antimicrobial use, and enhances market confidence.
For India, where poultry production continues to expand rapidly, widespread adoption of comprehensive biosecurity systems will be fundamental to sustainable growth. Success will require coordinated efforts involving producers, veterinarians, researchers, policymakers, industry organizations, and technology providers working within a One Health framework.
The future of poultry farming will increasingly depend on predictive health management supported by digital technologies, precision farming, artificial intelligence, and robust surveillance systems. Producers who integrate biosecurity into their core business strategy will be better equipped to withstand emerging disease threats, satisfy evolving consumer expectations, and compete successfully in international markets.
Ultimately, the most profitable poultry enterprise is not the one that spends the least on disease prevention, but the one that invests wisely to ensure disease never compromises productivity. Biosecurity should therefore be regarded not as an operational expense but as a high-return investment that protects animal health, public health, environmental sustainability, and the long-term resilience of the poultry industry.

Selected References
1. Alexander, D. J. (2007). An overview of the epidemiology of avian influenza. Vaccine, 25, 5637–5644.
2. FAO. (2023). Good Practices for Biosecurity in the Poultry Sector. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
3. Gelaude, P., Schlepers, M., Verlinden, M., et al. (2014). Measuring on-farm poultry biosecurity using Biocheck.UGent. Poultry Science, 93, 2740–2750.
4. Glisson, J. R., Hofacre, C. L., & Christensen, J. P. (2019). Poultry Diseases. Elsevier.
5. WOAH. (2023). Terrestrial Animal Health Code.
6. Swayne, D. E. (Ed.). (2020). Diseases of Poultry (14th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
7. World Health Organization. (2022). One Health Joint Plan of Action (2022–2026).
8. World Bank. (2022). One Health Operational Framework for Strengthening Animal Health Systems.
9. FAO. (2022). Biosecurity Guide for Poultry Production and Value Chains.
10. USDA APHIS. (2023). Defend the Flock: Biosecurity for Poultry Owners.

The 9th edition of the Global Talks Series features Dr. Bernhard Eckel, Vice President and Co-Founder of Dr. Eckel Animal Nutrition, Germany, a globally recognized leader in feed additive innovation and sustainable animal nutrition. This edition explores Dr. Eckel’s journey from his roots in practical farming to becoming one of the industry’s most respected voices in animal nutrition. With more than three decades of experience, he has played a pivotal role in advancing phytogenic feed additives, feed hygiene, gut health solutions, and nutritional technologies that support animal welfare, production efficiency, and sustainable livestock farming worldwide. A trained farmer and agricultural scientist with a doctorate in Animal Nutrition from the Technical University of Munich-Weihenstephan, Dr. Eckel continues to inspire the global feed and livestock industries through scientific innovation, practical expertise, and a strong commitment to sustainable protein production.

A Lifelong Passion for Animal Nutrition
Dr. Bernhard Eckel’s journey into animal nutrition began on a family farm, where he developed a deep understanding of agriculture from an early age. His practical training as a farmer revealed the close relationship between feed quality, animal health, productivity, and farm profitability. This realization inspired him to pursue agricultural science and specialize in animal nutrition.

Throughout his career, he has remained motivated by the opportunity to bridge scientific knowledge and practical application. For Dr. Eckel, animal nutrition represents a unique intersection of biology, economics, and sustainability, offering opportunities to improve production efficiency while simultaneously supporting animal welfare, environmental stewardship, and global food security.

Three Decades of Transformation in Feed Additives
Reflecting on more than thirty years of industry experience, Dr. Eckel identifies the transition away from antibiotic growth promoters as one of the most significant developments in animal nutrition. This shift fundamentally changed livestock production and accelerated innovation in scientifically validated alternatives, particularly phytogenic feed additives.

The industry’s growing emphasis on preventive health approaches has strengthened efforts to improve animal resilience, gut health, and overall performance. At the same time, the understanding that animal welfare and production efficiency can coexist has become increasingly accepted. Modern livestock systems now recognize that sustainable productivity depends on maintaining high welfare standards.

Consumer expectations have also evolved considerably. Today’s feed solutions must not only deliver performance but also meet demands for sustainability, safety, transparency, and economic viability.

The Growing Importance of Phytogenic Feed Additives
According to Dr. Eckel, the market for advanced feed additives will continue to expand in response to regulatory pressures, sustainability targets, and the need for efficient animal protein production.

Phytogenic feed additives are gaining increasing attention due to their broad range of functional benefits. Their antimicrobial properties, support for digestive health, and contribution to production stability make them valuable tools for modern livestock producers. As global markets become more volatile and producers seek greater resilience within production systems, plant-based nutritional solutions are expected to play an increasingly important role.


While regional differences will continue to influence adoption patterns, significant growth opportunities are anticipated across Asia and Latin America, where livestock production systems are undergoing rapid modernization and intensification.

Future Focus Areas: Gut Health, Feed Hygiene, and Endotoxin Management
Looking ahead, Dr. Eckel believes that future innovation will increasingly focus on supporting gut health and improving the resilience of production systems under challenging conditions. The next generation of feed additives will likely combine multiple functional benefits within a single solution, delivering antimicrobial support, microbiota stabilization, and improved digestion simultaneously.

Producers are increasingly seeking integrated solutions that address several production challenges while remaining practical and cost-effective.

Feed hygiene remains another critical area of focus. During the Dr. Eckel World Tour seminar in Bangkok, discussions highlighted the role of improved feed hygiene in reducing the risk of African Swine Fever transmission through contaminated feed. This continues to be an important issue in many regions worldwide and emphasizes the need for stronger biosecurity throughout the feed chain.

Equally important is the growing awareness of endotoxin management. Once viewed primarily as a livestock concern, endotoxins are now receiving increasing attention within the aquaculture sector. Discussions during the Aquatic Conference at VIV Health & Nutrition Asia demonstrated the industry’s growing recognition of the impact endotoxins can have on animal health and production performance.

“The future of livestock production lies in combining science, innovation, and sustainability. By strengthening gut health, feed hygiene, and animal welfare, we can create more resilient and efficient food systems for generations to come.”

— Dr. Bernhard Eckel

Shaping the Future of Animal Nutrition
Dr. Eckel believes the future of animal nutrition will be driven by the need to balance efficiency, resilience, and sustainability while ensuring reliable protein production in an increasingly uncertain world.

Several key trends are expected to define the industry’s future. Greater emphasis on gut health, wider adoption of multifunctional feed additives, and continued efforts to reduce antibiotic use will remain central priorities. Transparency and traceability across the livestock value chain will become increasingly important as consumers seek greater confidence in food production systems.

At the same time, digital technologies and artificial intelligence are expected to transform decision-making processes. Data-driven management tools will enable producers to optimize nutrition strategies, improve efficiency, and manage production complexity with greater precision.

For Dr. Bernhard Eckel, the future of animal nutrition lies in combining scientific innovation with practical solutions that strengthen animal health, support sustainable livestock production, and contribute to global food security.

The poultry industry invests significant resources into genetics, hatching and breeding to ensure high-quality birds enter the supply chain. How do you preserve that value through catching, transport, lairage, and processing – without compromising welfare, quality, or operational efficiency? Live bird handling has become one of the most critical control points in modern poultry processing. It directly influences product quality, compliance, yield, and overall plant performance.

Efficient, low-stress live bird handling is essential for the performance and success of any poultry processing operation.

The Challenge Behind Live Bird Handling
In today’s poultry industry, processors operate under increasing pressure from multiple directions.
Higher processing speeds demand more from every part of the system. At the same time, labour challenges make manual handling more difficult to sustain. Stricter animal welfare regulations continue to raise expectations, while sustainability targets require reductions in energy use, emissions, and waste. On top of this, biosecurity risks must be tightly controlled to protect both product and plant integrity.

These external pressures translate into very real operational challenges:
– Avoiding dead-on-arrivals and bird injuries
– Ensuring high standards of animal welfare throughout catching, transport, lairage, and reception
– Maintaining consistent product quality
– Ensuring steady line feeding without disruption
– Reducing reliance on manual labour
– Managing variability in farm and transport conditions

Even small inefficiencies in live bird handling can cascade through the entire production process, affecting both cost and output.

Automation in the reception area ensures smooth, efficient handling while reducing reliance on manual labour.

Why It Matters More Than Ever
Live birds represent a high-value input that has already required significant investment before they reach the plant. Any loss in quality during handling translates directly into lost yield and reduced profitability.

Poor handling conditions during catching, transport, or reception can lead to stress, injury, and inconsistent product quality. These issues do not remain isolated – they impact downstream efficiency, outcome quality, and customer expectations.

In contrast, well-designed handling systems help maintain control over a process that has traditionally been variable and labour-intensive.

Transport equipment should be robust and allow for a safe journey from farm to plant.

The Role of Modern Live Bird Handling Systems
To address the above-mentioned challenges, the industry is increasingly moving toward integrated, automated, and welfare-focused handling systems.
Modern solutions are designed to manage the full journey from farm to shackling in a controlled and consistent way, reducing variability and improving outcomes across multiple dimensions.

Key capabilities include:
Gentle and Controlled Handling
Reducing stress and physical impact during catching, transport, and unloading helps preserve both welfare and product quality.

Automated Processes Where It Counts
Automation in key areas such as catching, unloading, stacking, or equipment washing reduces labour dependency while improving consistency and throughput.

Stable Line Feeding
Reception systems are designed to ensure a continuous and controlled flow of birds to the shackling area, even at high processing speeds.

Environmental Control
Proper airflow during transport and lairage helps prevent heat stress and supports animal welfare under varying climate conditions.

Hygiene and Biosecurity
Washable and disinfection-ready systems help reduce pathogen risks and maintain strict hygiene standards between flocks.

Scalability and Flexibility
Modular system designs allow processors to expand capacity or adapt layouts as production needs evolve, without major operational disruption.

Highly effective washing equipment eliminates the risk of inconsistencies associated with manual cleaning, ensuring reliable and repeatable hygiene standards.

Key Factors in System Design
Selecting the right live bird handling approach depends heavily on operational context. Farm layout, infrastructure, and access conditions all influence system design.
Large-scale operations require high-capacity systems capable of handling volume efficiently, while maintaining gentle handling principles. In contrast, labour availability may determine the level of automation required.

Climate conditions also play an important role. Systems must support adequate airflow and temperature control to prevent heat stress during transport and lairage.
Finally, biosecurity requirements and cleaning protocols are increasingly important, requiring equipment designed for effective washing and contamination control.

A well-designed live bird handling system takes conditions across the farm, transport, and reception areas into account to ensure best performance

A System-Level Approach to Performance
The most effective live bird handling strategies treat the entire process as one integrated system rather than isolated steps.
From farm loading to plant reception, every stage must work together to maintain flow, protect bird welfare, and support consistent processing.
When this is achieved, processors benefit from:
– Improved animal welfare outcomes
– Higher and more consistent product quality
– Reduced dead-on-arrivals and injuries
– Better operational efficiency and throughput stability
– Lower labour dependency
– Stronger compliance with regulatory standards
–   Greater long-term scalability

Choosing the Right Provider
To meet these diverse needs of a global market, BAADER offers crate handling and module/drawer solutions in a variety of modular layout options. These solutions are designed to adapt to specific operational requirements, ensuring flexibility and efficiency in handling processes.

Our live bird handling specialists provide processing audits to effectively analyse current and future challenges, helping processors design reception layouts that meet market demands. With over 80 years of proven expertise in handling live birds, we offer solutions supported by both global and local services to ensure equipment operates smoothly and efficiently.

Visit: https://poultry.baader.com/live-bird-handling to learn more about the BAADER live bird handling solutions

Every day, a broiler’s intestine processes several times its body weight in feed and water, encounters billions of microorganisms, responds to environmental stress, and continuously decides what enters the body and what remains outside.

In many ways, the gut functions as a customs checkpoint, security system, digestive factory, and immune headquarters—all at the same time.

In fact, nearly 70% of the bird’s immune cells are associated with the gastrointestinal tract, making it a key player in both health and performance. The remarkable aspect is that when the gut is functioning well, nobody notices it. When it begins to fail, everybody notices the consequences.

The Modern Poultry Bird: Built for Speed
Today’s broiler is a biological marvel. Through decades of genetic selection, modern birds reach market weight faster and more efficiently than ever before.
However, this achievement comes with a hidden challenge.

The digestive tract has become one of the most critical performance-limiting organs in poultry production. Every gram of feed must be digested, absorbed, and converted into muscle within an increasingly compressed production cycle.

Twenty years ago, a small reduction in nutrient absorption might have gone unnoticed. Today, even minor intestinal inefficiencies can translate into measurable losses in body weight gain, feed conversion ratio, and profitability. Modern birds can no longer afford a lazy gut.

The Gut Is Constantly Making Decisions
Traditionally, we think of the intestine as a nutrient absorption organ.
In reality, the gut is making thousands of biological decisions every second.

– Should nutrients support growth or immunity?
– Should a microorganism be tolerated or eliminated?
– Should energy be invested in production or defense?
– Should the intestinal barrier remain open for absorption or tighten to prevent invasion?

These microscopic decisions ultimately determine flock performance.
In many ways, poultry production is not simply about feeding birds—it is about influencing the decisions being made within the gut.

The Hidden Cost of Inflammation
One of the most important concepts emerging in poultry science is that inflammation carries a nutritional cost.
Whenever the intestine encounters stress from pathogens, mycotoxins, heat, poor litter quality, or microbial imbalance, the immune system becomes activated.
The immune response is essential for survival, but it is expensive.
Energy that could support growth is redirected toward immune activity.
Amino acids that could build muscle are utilized to produce immune proteins and inflammatory mediators.
Vitamins and minerals become involved in tissue repair and antioxidant defense.
The bird continues eating, yet a significant proportion of nutrients may no longer be contributing to production.
This phenomenon is often referred to as the “hidden feed cost” of inflammation.

The Silent Performance Thief
One of the greatest misconceptions in poultry production is that intestinal problems always produce visible symptoms.
– Not necessarily.
– Many flocks show normal feed intake, acceptable mortality, and no obvious disease outbreaks. Yet they consistently fail to achieve target performance.
– A slight reduction in nutrient absorption.
– A minor microbial imbalance.
– A low level of intestinal inflammation.
– A subtle increase in intestinal permeability.
Individually these changes may appear insignificant. Collectively they can result in substantial economic losses. This is why gut health is increasingly viewed not as a disease issue but as a performance issue.

The Microbial Workforce Inside Every Bird
Perhaps the most fascinating discovery in recent years is the realization that birds are never truly alone.
The digestive tract contains trillions of microorganisms collectively known as the gut microbiome.
These microbes help digest feed ingredients, produce beneficial metabolites, support intestinal development, influence immune responses, and compete with harmful bacteria.
Some scientists now describe the microbiome as an additional organ because of its profound influence on bird health.
This raises an interesting question:
Are we feeding the bird, or are we feeding its microbiome?
The answer is both.
The future of poultry nutrition may depend as much on managing microbial populations as on balancing nutrients.

Heat Stress: The Gut’s Greatest Enemy
In many poultry-producing regions, heat stress has become one of the most significant challenges affecting gut health.
High environmental temperatures reduce blood flow to the intestine, increase oxidative stress, and compromise intestinal barrier integrity.
As a result, harmful bacterial toxins can cross the intestinal wall and trigger inflammation.
Often the first casualty of heat stress is not growth—it is gut integrity.
This may explain why heat-stressed flocks frequently show poorer FCR, increased wet litter, reduced nutrient utilization, and greater disease susceptibility.
As global temperatures continue to rise, protecting gut health during periods of heat stress will become increasingly important.

The Gut in the Antibiotic-Free Era
The poultry industry is rapidly transitioning toward antibiotic-free and reduced-antibiotic production systems.
While this shift addresses consumer concerns and regulatory requirements, it has also increased attention on intestinal health.
Without routine antibiotic growth promoters, producers must rely on alternative strategies to maintain gut stability.
Probiotics, prebiotics, β-glucans, mannan oligosaccharides (MOS), organic acids, phytogenic compounds, and postbiotics are increasingly being used to support intestinal resilience and microbial balance.
The focus is shifting from killing pathogens to creating an intestinal environment where beneficial microbes and the host can thrive together.

More Birds or More Protein?
The global poultry industry is not being asked to produce more birds.
It is being asked to produce more protein.
As the world’s population grows and consumers increasingly seek affordable animal protein, poultry production continues to expand. Industry projections estimate the sector will grow at a CAGR of approximately 5–7% over the coming years.

But growth alone is not enough.
Producers are expected to deliver more meat with fewer resources, lower feed costs, and a smaller environmental footprint.
This means that every gram of feed matters more than ever before.
And that brings us back to the gut.
Because the difference between feed consumed and protein produced is ultimately determined by the efficiency of the digestive system.

The Future Begins in the Gut
For decades, poultry production focused on genetics, nutrition, and disease control.
The next frontier may be intestinal resilience.
Future improvements in productivity will likely come from better management of inflammation, enhanced barrier integrity, optimized microbiomes, and improved nutrient efficiency within the gastrointestinal tract.
The question may no longer be:

“How much feed did the bird consume?”

Instead, the more important question may be:
“How much of that feed actually became growth?”
The answer lies within the gut.
Not because it is merely another organ, but because it is the organ that determines how effectively all the others perform.
In an era of narrow margins, rising feed costs, heat stress, and antibiotic-free production, the healthiest gut may ultimately become the most valuable asset in the poultry house.