Introduction

Why it matters in modern poultry production
– Rapid multiplication of Eimeria can produce substantial intestinal injury within a short period.
– Subclinical coccidiosis may reduce feed efficiency, growth and flock uniformity without dramatic clinical signs.
– High oocyst contamination of litter increases exposure and repeated infection pressure.
– Effective control requires attention to parasite biology, farm management and appropriate anticoccidial programmes.

Etiology
Seven major Eimeria species are recognized in chickens. E. acervulina and E. maxima are frequently encountered, while E. tenella is particularly pathogenic and associated with severe caecal disease and haemorrhage (Yaqub et al., 2023). Species differ in preferred intestinal sites, lesion patterns and pathogenicity.

Transmission
The principal route is faecal–oral transmission. Birds ingest sporulated oocysts from contaminated litter, feed, water, equipment or the environment. Moisture, oxygen and suitable temperature favour sporulation, allowing infective oocysts to accumulate and maintain the infection cycle (Pal et al., 2023).
Life Cycle of EIMERIA

Ingestion of sporulated oocysts → release of sporozoites → epithelial invasion → multiplication → gamete formation → oocyst formation → faecal shedding → environmental sporulation.

Clinical Signs
Severity depends on Eimeria species, infective dose, bird age, immunity and environmental management. Signs include reduced feed intake, depression, ruffled feathers, drooping wings, enteritis, diarrhoea or dysentery, poor growth and increased mortality in severe cases (Pal et al., 2023).
– Reduced body-weight gain and flock uniformity
– Poor feed conversion and production performance
– Diarrhoea or blood-stained droppings in severe infections
– Dehydration, weakness and depression
– Mortality when tissue damage and blood loss are extensive
Species-specific sites

Post-Mortem Lesions
Post-mortem examination helps identify likely Eimeria species and estimate the distribution and severity of intestinal damage. Lesion patterns should be interpreted with clinical findings, litter condition, performance data and, where appropriate, laboratory diagnosis (Pal et al., 2023; Yaqub et al., 2023).

Key lesion patterns

Prevention and Control
Effective control integrates anticoccidial programmes with litter management, hygiene, stocking-density control, ventilation and sound flock management. Continuous or inappropriate use of a single anticoccidial can contribute to reduced efficacy and resistance selection; rotation, shuttle programmes, combinations and vaccination are among approaches used for longer-term control (Usman et al., 2011; Chapman, 2017; Noack et al., 2019).

Anticoccidial programmes
– Rotation changes the active ingredient or mode of action between production cycles.
– Shuttle programmes use different anticoccidial strategies during different feed phases.
– Combination programmes can broaden anticoccidial activity and may help address reduced sensitivity when appropriately designed (Chapman & Rathinam, 2022).
– Vaccination can provide controlled exposure to selected Eimeria strains and support protective immunity.

Ionophore vs Chemical

Combination programmes
Combining compatible anticoccidial activities can broaden control and reduce dependence on a single mode of action. Programme selection should consider disease pressure, previous anticoccidial history, susceptibility patterns, compatibility and label requirements (Chapman & Rathinam, 2022).

STALLEN’S DUAL APPROACH TO COCCIDIOSIS CONTROL
Stallen South Asia offers a dual approach to coccidiosis management with Manacox Plus, bringing together ionophore and chemical anticoccidial activity in one formulation. This approach is designed to support practical, structured coccidiosis-control programmes while reducing dependence on a single mode of action.

MANACOX PLUS
Manacox Plus is a dual-active anticoccidial formulation combining an ionophore and a chemical anticoccidial. It contains Monensin Sodium 8% + Nicarbazin 8% for practical coccidiosis prevention programmes in broilers.
Key Product Points

WHY A DUAL APPROACH
Using monensin sodium together with nicarbazin brings ionophore and chemical anticoccidial activity into one formulation. This can fit structured prevention programmes where the objective is effective control without unnecessary reliance on a single mode of action. Use should follow the approved label and veterinary guidance.
Practical use
– Use within a planned farm coccidiosis-control programme.
– Maintain good litter quality, ventilation, stocking density and drinker management.
– Review anticoccidial history and flock response when planning future programmes.
– Follow approved dose, withdrawal period and compatibility instructions.

References are available on request.

Introduction : Every year, invisible contaminants hidden within grains and feed ingredients silently reduce livestock productivity. Mycotoxins—naturally occurring toxic compounds produced by fungi—are responsible for millions of dollars in economic losses through poor growth, reduced immunity, reproductive disorders, lower feed efficiency, and increased mortality. Although impossible to see with the naked eye, their impact on poultry, swine, and dairy production is enormous.

What Are Mycotoxins?
Mycotoxins are toxic secondary metabolites produced by moulds such as Aspergillus, Fusarium, and Penicillium. Scientists have identified over 300 different mycotoxins, and studies indicate that nearly one-quarter of global feed supplies may be contaminated.
The most economically important toxins include:
-Aflatoxins
– Ochratoxins
– Fumonisins
– Deoxynivalenol (DON)
– T-2 Toxin
– Zearalenone
Each affects animals differently, but all reduce productivity and profitability.

Why Do Mycotoxins Develop?
Moulds flourish when four conditions come together:
– Warm temperatures
– High humidity
– Moisture in grains
– Oxygen
Once established, fungal growth continues during harvesting, storage, transportation, and feed manufacturing unless properly controlled.

India’s Mycotoxin Challenge
Recent testing presented in the report paints a worrying picture. 6,304 feed analysis, 99% contamination, and 83% above the performance-risk threshold.
Key Findings

– 6,304 feed analysis conducted
– 99% showed detectable contamination
– 83% exceeded performance-risk thresholds
Among ingredients, DORB, peanut meal, maize, soybean meal, DDGS, and corn gluten all showed significant contamination levels.

Multiple Mycotoxins: A Greater Threat
Animals are rarely exposed to a single toxin.
Instead, feeds commonly contain multiple mycotoxins that interact synergistically, making the combined damage significantly greater than the effect of individual toxins. This explains why even relatively low toxin concentrations can cause substantial production losses.

Economic Impact on Farms
The consequences are visible across every production system.

Poultry
– Lower feed intake
– Reduced weight gain
– Poor feed conversion
– Thin eggshells
– Lower hatchability
– Fatty liver
– Weak immunity

Swine
– Reproductive disorders
– Embryonic mortality
– Vomiting
– Reduced growth
– Feed refusal
– Tail necrosis
– Liver and kidney damage
Ultimately, these problems translate directly into economic losses through poorer animal performance.

The Hidden Cost: Immune Suppression
– One of the most damaging effects of mycotoxins is their ability to suppress the immune system.
– Animals become more vulnerable to bacterial and viral infections while showing reduced responses to vaccines and treatments.
– This means disease outbreaks become more severe and recovery becomes slower.

Can Nutrition Help?
Nutritional interventions can reduce the impact of toxins.

Recommended approaches include:
– Higher amino acid supplementation
– Vitamins E, C, and D3
– Selenium
– Choline chloride
– Liver-support products
– Mold inhibitors
– Broad-spectrum toxin binders
These measures improve resilience while reducing toxin damage.

Scientific Toxin Elimination Management (STEM-500)
An effective strategy combines four complementary actions:
1. Prevention
Prevent fungal growth before toxins develop.
2. Elimination
Bind multiple mycotoxins irreversibly.
3. Neutralization
Use enzymatic systems to neutralize toxins.
4. Gut Ecology Enhancement
Improve gut health while strengthening immunity and reducing pathogen pressure. This integrated approach offers broader protection than relying on toxin binders alone.

Featured Solution: STEM-500
The presentation introduces STEM-500, a multi-component toxin management product formulated with:
– Specially treated HSCAS
– Organic acids
– Oxine Copper
– MOS
– Bio-active phytocompounds
– Polyphenols
– Lactobacillus
– Lipotropic agents
According to the presentation, the product is designed to reduce mould growth, bind multiple mycotoxins, minimize endotoxin effects, improve liver function, support gut health, and enhance feed conversion, growth, and survival.

Conclusion
Mycotoxins remain one of the most significant hidden threats in modern animal production. Since contamination can occur throughout the grain supply chain, prevention alone is rarely sufficient. A comprehensive management strategy—combining mould control, toxin binding, detoxification, and gut health support—is essential for maintaining animal health and maximizing production efficiency.

Biosecurity as an Investment: Why Disease Prevention delivers the Best Return on Investment (ROI) in Poultry Production

Prof. (Dr.) P.K. Shukla and Dr. Amitav Bhattacharyya
Department of Poultry Science, College of Veterinary Science and
Animal Husbandry, Mathura- 281001 (U.P.)

Introduction
Over the last five decades, the poultry industry has undergone a remarkable transformation. Scientific advances in genetics, nutrition, housing, disease control, and management have enabled producers to achieve unprecedented levels of productivity. Poultry meat and eggs have become among the most affordable and nutritious sources of animal protein, making the industry indispensable for global food and nutritional security. In India, poultry production has developed into an important agribusiness sector, generating employment for millions of people while supporting allied industries such as hatcheries, feed manufacturing, pharmaceuticals, processing, transportation, and retail.

Despite these achievements, infectious diseases remain one of the greatest constraints to sustainable poultry production. Diseases such as avian influenza, Newcastle disease, infectious bronchitis, infectious bursal disease, Marek’s disease, coccidiosis, salmonellosis, and mycoplasmosis continue to cause substantial economic losses. These diseases not only reduce flock productivity but also affect food safety, consumer confidence, international trade, and public health.

Under modern intensive production systems, disease outbreaks spread rapidly because of high stocking densities, frequent movement of birds and equipment, and increasing interactions among farms. Once pathogens establish themselves within a flock, economic losses accumulate through mortality, reduced growth, poor feed conversion, lower egg production, treatment expenses, and market disruptions. Consequently, preventing disease introduction is far more economical than managing disease after it has occurred.

Biosecurity has therefore become the foundation of modern poultry health management. It is no longer viewed merely as a collection of hygiene practices but as a comprehensive risk management strategy designed to prevent disease while maximizing productivity and profitability.

Economic Impact of Poultry Diseases
The financial consequences of poultry diseases extend far beyond mortality alone. Disease outbreaks affect every component of the production chain, from breeder farms and hatcheries to processing plants, retailers, and consumers.

Direct economic losses include increased mortality, poor weight gain, reduced egg production, inferior feed conversion efficiency, decreased hatchability, veterinary expenses, medication costs, diagnostic testing, and emergency vaccination programmes. Even mild infections that do not cause obvious mortality often reduce flock performance sufficiently to eliminate expected profit margins.

Indirect losses are frequently even greater. Disease outbreaks can result in movement restrictions, export bans, lower consumer demand, reduced processing efficiency, insurance costs, and disruption of supply chains. Highly pathogenic avian influenza has repeatedly demonstrated how a single outbreak can result in massive financial losses through depopulation, compensation payments, and trade restrictions.
Equally damaging are the hidden costs associated with subclinical infections. Chronic disease reduces flock uniformity, suppresses immune responses, increases susceptibility to secondary infections, and diminishes reproductive performance without producing dramatic clinical signs. Such losses often remain unnoticed but continuously erode farm profitability.
These economic realities highlight an important principle: disease prevention should not be regarded solely as a veterinary responsibility but as an essential business strategy that protects investments in chicks, feed, labour, housing, equipment, and marketing.

Prevention Versus Treatment: The Economics of Biosecurity
The principle that “prevention is better than cure” has special relevance in commercial poultry production. Intensive poultry systems house thousands of genetically similar birds in close proximity, allowing infectious agents to spread extremely rapidly once introduced.

By the time clinical signs become evident, pathogens have often multiplied extensively within the flock and contaminated the surrounding environment. Even if treatment successfully controls mortality, birds rarely regain their original production potential. Reduced feed efficiency, slower growth, delayed marketing age, poor egg production, and increased susceptibility to secondary infections frequently persist throughout the production cycle.
Treatment also involves considerable expenditure on antibiotics, supportive medications, laboratory investigations, veterinary consultation, and labour. These costs are incurred after production losses have already begun, thereby reducing overall profitability.
Biosecurity interrupts pathogen transmission before infection becomes established. Investments in perimeter fencing, controlled farm access, sanitation, water treatment, pest management, employee training, and visitor control substantially reduce the probability of disease introduction. Unlike treatment costs, preventive investments continue generating economic returns throughout successive production cycles by maintaining flock health and preserving production efficiency.
Numerous studies have shown that the cost of implementing effective biosecurity programmes is significantly lower than the cumulative losses associated with disease outbreaks. Consequently, biosecurity functions as a form of biological insurance that safeguards every other investment made in poultry production.

Principles of Poultry Biosecurity
Biosecurity is a science-based management system aimed at preventing the introduction, establishment, and spread of infectious agents. Effective biosecurity requires an integrated approach involving infrastructure, operational procedures, personnel behaviour, environmental sanitation, and continuous monitoring.
Three fundamental principles form the basis of poultry biosecurity:

Bio-exclusion focuses on preventing pathogens from entering the farm through controlled access, procurement of healthy chicks, vehicle disinfection, quarantine, and visitor management.

Bio-containment prevents infectious agents from spreading outside infected premises by implementing movement restrictions, proper disposal of carcasses and litter, and thorough cleaning and disinfection.

Bio-management minimizes disease pressure within the farm through vaccination, optimal nutrition, environmental management, pest control, water sanitation, litter management, and animal welfare practices.

Farm design also plays an important role in disease prevention. Poultry farms should be located away from other commercial farms, live bird markets, and migratory bird habitats. Clearly defined clean and dirty zones, all-in/all-out production systems, and adequate downtime between flocks reduce pathogen survival and transmission.
Personnel hygiene is equally critical. Farm workers should use dedicated clothing and footwear, maintain hand hygiene, comply with visitor restrictions, and receive regular biosecurity training. Similarly, feed and water must be protected from contamination through proper storage, water chlorination, and routine quality monitoring.
Rodent and insect control programmes, together with scientifically approved mortality disposal methods, further strengthen disease prevention by eliminating important sources of pathogen transmission.

Biosecurity as a Strategic Business Investment
Historically, many poultry producers regarded expenditures on sanitation, fencing, disinfection equipment, employee training, and surveillance as unavoidable operating costs. Modern poultry enterprises increasingly recognize that these expenditures are investments that protect all other farm assets.

Feed represents nearly two-thirds of total production costs. Healthy birds utilize feed more efficiently, grow faster, produce more eggs, and require fewer medications than diseased birds. Even modest improvements in feed conversion ratio can substantially increase profitability.
Strong biosecurity systems also improve market confidence. Consumers increasingly demand poultry products that are safe, traceable, and produced under high standards of animal health and welfare. Farms maintaining effective biosecurity programmes are better positioned to comply with certification schemes, quality assurance standards, and export requirements.
From a business perspective, biosecurity reduces biological risk while improving enterprise resilience. Disease outbreaks can rapidly destroy years of investment in genetics, housing, labour, and marketing. Preventive biosecurity therefore serves as a protective framework that preserves productivity, enhances competitiveness, and ensures long-term sustainability.
Modern poultry producers should therefore ask not whether they can afford to invest in biosecurity, but whether they can afford the consequences of inadequate disease prevention.

Practical Biosecurity Measures that Enhance Profitability
The success of any biosecurity programme depends on its consistent implementation at the farm level. While sophisticated infrastructure and advanced technologies can strengthen disease prevention, many highly effective biosecurity interventions are simple, practical, and relatively inexpensive. Their value lies not in high capital investment but in disciplined and continuous application.

The first line of defence is strict farm access control. Entry to poultry houses should be restricted to essential personnel, and all visitors should comply with hygiene protocols including hand sanitization, use of dedicated clothing and boots, and passage through properly maintained footbaths. Maintaining visitor records and enforcing a minimum downtime for personnel who have recently visited other poultry farms significantly reduce the likelihood of introducing infectious pathogens.
Cleaning and disinfection remain the cornerstone of disease prevention. Poultry houses, equipment, feeders, drinkers, egg trays, transport crates, and vehicles should be thoroughly cleaned to remove organic matter before applying appropriate disinfectants. Adequate downtime between production cycles allows environmental pathogen loads to decline naturally and improves the effectiveness of sanitation programmes.
Feed and water hygiene are equally important because they represent continuous sources of pathogen exposure. Feed should be procured from reliable manufacturers and stored under dry, rodent-proof conditions to prevent fungal contamination and mycotoxin development.
Drinking water should be regularly tested for microbial quality, chlorinated when necessary, and supplied through cleaned pipelines to minimize biofilm formation.
Integrated pest management also plays a critical role. Rodents, flies, beetles, mosquitoes, and wild birds serve as mechanical carriers of numerous bacterial and viral pathogens. Effective pest control, combined with scientific carcass disposal methods such as composting, rendering, or incineration, minimizes environmental contamination and pathogen persistence.
Finally, employee education is perhaps the most cost-effective biosecurity investment. Every worker should understand disease transmission pathways, recognize early clinical signs, and consistently follow standard operating procedures (SOPs). A well-trained workforce transforms biosecurity from a written protocol into a daily management culture that protects flock health and farm profitability.

Digital Transformation of Poultry Biosecurity
Rapid advances in digital technologies are revolutionizing poultry health management by shifting disease control from a reactive to a predictive approach. Precision livestock farming integrates artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, sensor technologies, automation, and molecular diagnostics to improve disease surveillance and decision-making.

Artificial intelligence can analyse production data such as feed intake, water consumption, mortality, growth rate, and behavioural changes to detect early indicators of disease before clinical signs become apparent. Such predictive systems enable farmers to intervene promptly, thereby reducing mortality and economic losses.
The Internet of Things (IoT) has further strengthened biosecurity by enabling continuous monitoring of environmental variables including temperature, humidity, ammonia concentration, carbon dioxide, ventilation efficiency, and water quality. Automated alerts help managers respond immediately to deviations that may compromise bird health.
Computer vision systems are increasingly being used to monitor flock behaviour, feeding activity, movement patterns, and gait abnormalities. These technologies allow rapid identification of subtle behavioural changes associated with disease onset.
Molecular diagnostic tools such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), real-time PCR, and genomic sequencing permit rapid detection of viral, bacterial, and parasitic pathogens, facilitating timely intervention. Blockchain-based traceability systems and cloud-based farm management platforms further enhance transparency, certification, and supply chain confidence.
Although digital biosecurity requires initial investment, its long-term benefits include reduced disease incidence, improved productivity, lower veterinary costs, enhanced decision-making, and increased resilience against emerging diseases.

Biosecurity Challenges and Opportunities in India
India has become one of the world’s leading producers of poultry meat and eggs, yet the country’s diverse production systems create unique biosecurity challenges. Large integrated commercial operations coexist with smallholder and backyard poultry farms, creating epidemiological interfaces that facilitate pathogen transmission.

One of the major constraints is uneven awareness regarding the economic importance of biosecurity. Large poultry companies generally maintain comprehensive disease prevention programmes, whereas many small and medium-scale producers continue to regard biosecurity as an additional expense rather than a productive investment. Financial limitations often prevent investment in essential infrastructure such as perimeter fencing, vehicle disinfection facilities, controlled farm entry, and scientific carcass disposal systems.
High poultry density in several production clusters further increases disease risk. Frequent movement of day-old chicks, feed, eggs, live birds, and farm personnel across states facilitates pathogen dissemination. Backyard poultry, live bird markets, and mixed farming systems involving ducks and other livestock also increase the risk of zoonotic disease transmission.
Despite these challenges, India possesses significant opportunities to strengthen poultry biosecurity. The country has a strong network of veterinary universities, diagnostic laboratories, research institutes, extension agencies, and progressive poultry companies capable of promoting scientific disease prevention. Government initiatives supporting livestock health, antimicrobial stewardship, digital agriculture, and the One Health approach can further accelerate adoption of comprehensive biosecurity practices.
Public-private partnerships involving industry associations, academic institutions, pharmaceutical companies, and producer organizations will be instrumental in developing practical, affordable, and scalable biosecurity solutions for Indian poultry farmers.

Biosecurity within the One Health Framework
Modern biosecurity extends beyond farm profitability to encompass animal health, public health, and environmental sustainability. The One Health concept recognizes the close interdependence of humans, animals, and ecosystems.

Effective poultry biosecurity reduces the circulation of zoonotic pathogens such as avian influenza and Salmonella, thereby protecting consumers, farm workers, and surrounding communities. Healthy flocks also require fewer therapeutic antibiotics, contributing to global efforts to combat antimicrobial resistance (AMR).
Good biosecurity practices improve waste management, reduce contamination of soil and water resources, and minimize environmental dissemination of infectious agents. Consequently, investments in poultry biosecurity generate societal benefits that extend far beyond individual farms by supporting food safety, environmental protection, and national food security.

Capacity Building and Policy Support
Infrastructure alone cannot guarantee successful biosecurity. Human behaviour remains one of the most critical determinants of disease prevention. Continuous training programmes should therefore be provided for farm owners, managers, veterinarians, technicians, and workers on disease recognition, personal hygiene, vaccination, cleaning and disinfection, pest control, mortality management, and emergency response.
Routine biosecurity audits, risk assessments, and comprehensive record-keeping systems enable producers to monitor flock performance and identify weaknesses requiring corrective action. Standard operating procedures should be regularly reviewed and updated in response to emerging disease threats and technological developments.
Government agencies also have an essential role in strengthening national biosecurity through veterinary services, laboratory networks, surveillance systems, science-based regulations, and financial incentives that encourage producers to invest in preventive infrastructure. Harmonization of national standards with international guidelines will further improve India’s competitiveness in global poultry trade.

Way Forward
Biosecurity has evolved from a routine veterinary recommendation into one of the most valuable strategic investments in modern poultry production. Scientific evidence consistently demonstrates that prevention delivers substantially greater economic returns than treatment. Every investment made in disease prevention safeguards valuable biological assets, preserves productivity, reduces veterinary expenditure, minimizes antimicrobial use, and enhances market confidence.
For India, where poultry production continues to expand rapidly, widespread adoption of comprehensive biosecurity systems will be fundamental to sustainable growth. Success will require coordinated efforts involving producers, veterinarians, researchers, policymakers, industry organizations, and technology providers working within a One Health framework.
The future of poultry farming will increasingly depend on predictive health management supported by digital technologies, precision farming, artificial intelligence, and robust surveillance systems. Producers who integrate biosecurity into their core business strategy will be better equipped to withstand emerging disease threats, satisfy evolving consumer expectations, and compete successfully in international markets.
Ultimately, the most profitable poultry enterprise is not the one that spends the least on disease prevention, but the one that invests wisely to ensure disease never compromises productivity. Biosecurity should therefore be regarded not as an operational expense but as a high-return investment that protects animal health, public health, environmental sustainability, and the long-term resilience of the poultry industry.

Selected References
1. Alexander, D. J. (2007). An overview of the epidemiology of avian influenza. Vaccine, 25, 5637–5644.
2. FAO. (2023). Good Practices for Biosecurity in the Poultry Sector. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
3. Gelaude, P., Schlepers, M., Verlinden, M., et al. (2014). Measuring on-farm poultry biosecurity using Biocheck.UGent. Poultry Science, 93, 2740–2750.
4. Glisson, J. R., Hofacre, C. L., & Christensen, J. P. (2019). Poultry Diseases. Elsevier.
5. WOAH. (2023). Terrestrial Animal Health Code.
6. Swayne, D. E. (Ed.). (2020). Diseases of Poultry (14th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
7. World Health Organization. (2022). One Health Joint Plan of Action (2022–2026).
8. World Bank. (2022). One Health Operational Framework for Strengthening Animal Health Systems.
9. FAO. (2022). Biosecurity Guide for Poultry Production and Value Chains.
10. USDA APHIS. (2023). Defend the Flock: Biosecurity for Poultry Owners.

Introduction
Inclusion Body Hepatitis (IBH) is an economically important viral disease of broiler chickens characterized by sudden mortality, hepatitis, and the presence of intranuclear inclusion bodies in liver cells. The disease is primarily caused by Fowl Adenoviruses (FAdVs), particularly serotypes belonging to species D and E. IBH has become increasingly significant worldwide due to its impact on broiler performance, increased mortality, poor feed conversion, and substantial economic losses. The disease mainly affects young broiler chickens between 3 and 7 weeks of age, although birds of other ages may also be affected. Vertical transmission from breeder flocks and horizontal spread through contaminated litter, water, equipment, and personnel play major roles in disease dissemination.

Etiology
IBH is caused by Fowl Adenoviruses (FAdVs), non-enveloped double-stranded DNA viruses belonging to the genus Aviadenovirus within the family Adenoviridae. Several serotypes have been associated with disease outbreaks, including FAdV-2, FAdV-8a, FAdV-8b, and FAdV-11.
Predisposing factors include:
– Immunosuppression caused by Infectious Bursal Disease (IBD)
– Chicken Infectious Anemia (CIA)
– Mycotoxicosis (Poor quality of feed ingredients contaminated with fungus and Mycotoxins).
– Poor Biosecurity and Management
– High stocking density

Clinical Signs
Affected broiler flocks may exhibit:
– Sudden increase in mortality
– Depression and lethargy
– Huddling with Ruffled feathers
– Reduced feed and water consumption
– Usually affects birds of 3 to 5 weeks age, but can be seen in the chicks aging from 4-5 day old.
– Pale comb and wattles
– Poor weight gain
– Diarrhoea with mucoid droppings or green droppings
– Anemia in severe cases
Mortality rates generally range from 5–15%, but outbreaks may occasionally result in mortality exceeding 30%.

Post-Mortem Lesions
The most characteristic lesions are observed in the liver.
Gross Lesions
Liver
– Enlarged, swollen, and pale liver
– Yellowish discoloration
– Multifocal necrotic foci
– Petechial and ecchymotic hemorrhages
– Friable consistency
Kidneys
– Enlarged and pale kidneys
– Congestion
Heart
– Hydropericardium may occasionally be present
– Pale myocardium
Spleen
– Enlargement and congestion
Histopathological Lesions
Microscopic examination reveals:
– Severe hepatic necrosis
– Basophilic intranuclear inclusion bodies in hepatocytes
– Degeneration and destruction of liver cells
– Mononuclear cell infiltration
The presence of characteristic intranuclear inclusion bodies is considered pathognomonic for IBH.

Serology
Serological testing is useful for monitoring flock exposure and breeder immunity.
Common serological methods include:
ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay)
– Detects antibodies against Fowl Adenovirus
– Useful for flock monitoring
– Evaluates maternal antibody levels
Virus Neutralization Test (VNT)
– Determines serotype-specific antibodies
– Primarily used in research and epidemiological investigations
Interpretation
– High antibody titers in breeders provide maternal protection to progeny.
– Seroconversion in broilers indicates field exposure.
– Paired serum samples can help determine recent infection.
Diagnosis
Diagnosis should be based on a combination of clinical history, post-mortem findings, histopathology, and laboratory confirmation.
Field Diagnosis
Suspect IBH when:
– Sudden mortality occurs in 3–7 week-old broilers.
– Enlarged, pale, hemorrhagic liver is observed.
– There is a history of immunosuppressive diseases.
Laboratory Diagnosis
Histopathology
– Demonstration of intranuclear inclusion bodies in hepatocytes.
Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)
– Highly sensitive and specific.
– Detects and identifies FAdV serotypes.
Virus Isolation
– Performed in chicken embryo liver cells or embryonated eggs.
Immunohistochemistry
– Detects adenoviral antigen within tissues.
Sequencing
– Used for epidemiological studies and strain characterization.

Treatment
There is no specific antiviral treatment for Inclusion Body Hepatitis.

Management is mainly supportive:
Supportive Therapy
– Multivitamin supplementation
– Vitamin E and Selenium administration
– Use D’Bio-Mix 20-25 mL per 100 birds and ABES-URZZA 20 ml for 100 birds.
– Ionic electrolyte (ABESTRAL) supplementation and probiotic prebiotic supplementation
— Adequate hydration
Control of Secondary Infections
– Antibiotics may be administered under veterinary supervision to control secondary bacterial infections.
Management Measures
– Reduce stress factors
– Improve ventilation
– Maintain litter quality
– Ensure proper nutrition

Prevention and Control
Effective prevention relies on biosecurity and breeder vaccination.

Biosecurity Measures
– All-in/all-out management
– Thorough cleaning and disinfection
– Restriction of farm visitors
– Proper disposal of dead birds
– Control of rodents and insects
– Sanitation of equipment and vehicles
Breeder Flock Management
– Monitor antibody levels regularly.
– Vaccinate breeders to ensure maternal antibody transfer.
– Prevent immunosuppressive diseases such as IBD and CIA.
Control of Vertical Transmission
– Maintain healthy breeder flocks.
– Conduct routine serological surveillance.
– Implement strict hatchery hygiene.

Vaccination Schedule
Vaccination strategies vary according to local epidemiology and circulating serotypes.
Breeder Vaccination Program
Age Vaccine
8–10 weeks Killed IBH (primary dose)
14–16 weeks Booster dose
18–20 weeks (before lay) Optional booster in high-risk areas
Broiler Vaccination
Routine vaccination of broilers is generally not practiced in many regions because protection is primarily achieved through maternal antibodies. However, live or inactivated vaccines may be considered in endemic areas under veterinary guidance.
Objectives of Vaccination
– Prevent vertical transmission
– Enhance maternal antibody levels
– Reduce mortality and production losses
– Improve flock uniformity

Economic Impact
IBH can result in:
– Increased mortality
– Poor growth performance
– Reduced feed efficiency
– Higher medication costs
– Increased carcass condemnation
– Significant financial losses to poultry producers

Conclusion
Inclusion Body Hepatitis remains an important viral disease of modern broiler production. Early diagnosis, strict biosecurity, breeder vaccination, and effective management practices are essential for disease prevention and control. Maintaining strong maternal immunity through breeder vaccination and minimizing immunosuppressive conditions can significantly reduce the impact of IBH on commercial poultry operations.

Clean, high-quality drinking water is one of the most important factors affecting the health, performance, and productivity of commercial poultry flocks. Before starting any ongoing water treatment program, producers must first ensure the entire water distribution system is thoroughly cleaned and free of accumulated deposits.

Why Deep-Water Line Cleaning Is Essential
Over time, poultry drinking lines develop biofilm, scale, and mineral buildup. These layers provide ideal hiding spots and nutrients for harmful bacteria such as E. coli, Pseudomonas, and Salmonella. Pathogens protected inside biofilm can survive for extended periods and continuously re-contaminate the flock.
Heavy buildup can also reduce water flow dramatically – sometimes by 70-80% – leading to reduced water intake and poorer flock performance. Traditional cleaning products often fall short when dealing with established biofilm, and some acidifiers or additives can even encourage yeast and fungal growth in certain conditions.

A Superior Cleaning Solution
One standout product that addresses these challenges effectively is Intra Hydrocare, an advanced stabilized hydrogen peroxide formulation. Thanks to its unique stabilization technology, it delivers a controlled, long-lasting oxidative action that penetrates deep into lines and reaches the very last nipple drinker.

Unlike conventional cleaners, Intra Hydrocare:
– Effectively breaks down and removes stubborn biofilm
– Eliminates a wide range of bacteria, viruses, yeasts, and fungi — even those shielded within biofilm
– Helps manage organic material along with certain mineral deposits
– Is biodegradable and safe for equipment, animals, and the environment when used according to label instructions
– Carries strong regulatory approvals across multiple countries

Key Factors to Evaluate Before Cleaning
Successful water system cleaning starts with understanding your specific situation:
– Water Source: Well water is particularly prone to biofilm and slime. Even treated municipal water can develop issues due to low flow rates and temperature increases inside poultry houses.
– Water Chemistry: High levels of calcium, magnesium, iron, manganese, or sulfur accelerate scale formation and residues.
– Previous Treatments: Regular use of vitamins, electrolytes, sugars, or mild acidifiers often accelerates organic buildup and makes lines harder to clean.
– Flock Health History: Recurring issues such as E. coli infections, necrotic enteritis, or respiratory problems can sometimes be traced back to contaminated water lines.

Recommended Deep Cleaning Procedure (Empty House)
1. Remove birds and flush the entire system with plain water, using high pressure where possible to dislodge loose debris.
2. Prepare a 1-3% solution of Intra Hydrocare (typically 1-3 liters per 100 liters of water) using a reliable medicator or injector.
3. Fill all lines completely, activate the nipple drinkers, and allow adequate contact time-preferably up to 24 hours for heavy biofilm.
4. Thoroughly flush the system afterward with clean water.
Note on volumes: A 100-foot section of ½-inch line typically holds approximately 9.5 liters. Accurate calculation ensures proper dosing and coverage.

Maintaining Clean Lines Between Flocks
A one-time deep clean is only the beginning. To prevent rapid recontamination, implement a daily water sanitation program using Intra Hydrocare at maintenance levels (generally 50–100 ml per 1,000 liters of water). Its slow-release properties provide ongoing protection without compromising bird performance.
For farms with hard water, combining the treatment with appropriate descaling steps can further improve results. Pay special attention to water quality during the first 7–10 days after placement of a new flock.

Bottom Line
High-performing poultry flocks need consistent access to clean, safe drinking water. Investing in proper water line cleaning and ongoing sanitation with a proven, effective product like Intra Hydrocare helps protect bird health, improve performance, and support better profitability.
Producers looking for reliable protocols tailored to their operation should consult their local Intracare professionals for practical guidance.

Balancing Air Quality in Poultry Houses: Tackling Ammonia and Humidity for Health and Productivity

Dr. Pawar Rutik Namdev1 (MVSc Scholar), Dr. Shipra Tiwari1 (MVSc Scholar),
Dr. Mahendra Kumar Patel1 (Ph.D Scholar)
1College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, DUVASU Mathura (281001), India

Abstract
The environment within poultry houses plays a decisive role in the overall health, performance, and welfare of birds. Among various factors, the concentration of ammonia (NH₃) and the level of relative humidity (RH) are the most critical. Ammonia, released from the microbial breakdown of waste, and excessive humidity, which influences litter moisture, often work together to create poor air quality. This review highlights how these two factors are produced, their combined impact on broilers and layers, and outlines practical approaches for monitoring and management to maintain profitability and bird well-being.

1. Introduction
For poultry farmers, achieving optimal productivity requires not just good feed and genetics, but also maintaining a favorable environment inside the house. Air quality, ventilation, and litter condition all directly affect flock health. Ammonia gas and humidity levels are particularly important, as they can significantly influence bird growth, egg production, immune strength, and overall welfare. Excessive ammonia harms the respiratory tract, reduces feed intake, and lowers growth efficiency, while uncontrolled humidity leads to wet litter, higher ammonia emissions, and disease outbreaks. To ensure healthy flocks, ammonia should ideally be kept below 20–25 ppm and RH within 50–70%.

2. How Ammonia and Humidity Build Up
2.1 Generation of Ammonia
Ammonia is created naturally when uric acid in droppings is decomposed by bacteria. The process is intensified under warm, moist, and alkaline conditions. The type of litter material, stocking density, feed composition (especially protein levels), and frequency of manure removal all influence ammonia levels. Houses with poor cleaning routines or high moisture accumulation often experience higher NH₃ concentrations.

2.2 Role of Humidity
Humidity directly controls litter moisture content. High RH slows the evaporation of water from bedding, resulting in wet litter that promotes microbial activity and ammonia release. Conversely, very low RH increases dust particles in the air, which irritates the birds’ airways. Thus, moisture management is closely tied to controlling ammonia levels.

3. Impacts on Bird Health and Physiology
3.1 Respiratory Effects
Ammonia acts as a strong irritant to the respiratory tract. Continuous exposure damages the trachea and air sacs, reducing the ability of cilia to filter pathogens. Birds exposed to more than 20–25 ppm are more prone to respiratory diseases such as Newcastle, bronchitis, and Mycoplasma infections. Vaccination responses also tend to decline.

3.2 Eye and Skin Irritation
Chronic exposure to ammonia causes conjunctivitis, watery eyes, and corneal damage. High RH contributes to wet litter that leads to footpad dermatitis, hock burns, and breast blisters—all of which compromise welfare and reduce carcass quality at processing.

3.3 Growth and Feed Efficiency
High levels of ammonia reduce appetite, slow weight gain, and impair feed conversion. Even a small increase in feed conversion ratio (FCR) significantly raises production costs, especially in large flocks. Performance losses become severe when ammonia concentrations exceed 50 ppm for prolonged periods.

3.4 Immunity
Birds raised in poor air quality often show weaker immune responses. Prolonged exposure to ammonia not only stresses birds but also reduces antibody production after vaccination, leaving them vulnerable to disease outbreaks.

3.5 Egg Production
In layer flocks, poor litter conditions and elevated ammonia cause stress, leading to reduced laying rates, smaller egg size, and poor shell quality. Mortality may also rise due to an increased risk of secondary infections.

4. The Combined Impact of Ammonia and Humidity
Although ammonia and humidity can each harm poultry, their combination is especially damaging. High RH makes litter wetter, which in turn boosts ammonia emissions. Humid air also traps ammonia at bird level, ensuring birds inhale more of it. Together, these conditions encourage respiratory infections, coccidiosis outbreaks, poor weight gain, higher mortality, and overall production losses.

5. Monitoring Levels
5.1 Threshold Values
Ammonia: Should remain below 20–25 ppm (ideally closer to 10 ppm). Birds show signs of irritation even at levels humans may not detect by smell.

Relative Humidity: Best maintained between 50–70%. RH above 75% promotes wet litter, while RH below 40% leads to dust and dehydration.

5.2 Measurement Tools
Ammonia: Can be monitored using portable gas detectors, color tubes, or continuous electronic sensors.
Humidity: Inexpensive hygrometers placed at bird height provide reliable readings and are often integrated into automatic ventilation systems.

6. Strategies for Control
6.1 Ventilation
Proper ventilation ensures air exchange, dilutes gases, and removes excess moisture.

In cold weather: minimum ventilation prevents humidity build-up without chilling the birds. fans and circulation systems increase air movement and reduce heat stress.

6.2 Litter Management
Maintaining dry litter is essential. Turning litter, replacing wet spots, using absorbent bedding materials, and preventing drinker leaks are key practices. Chemical litter amendments such as alum or sodium bisulfate can reduce pH, minimizing ammonia release.

6.3 Nutrition
Adjusting feed formulations to match amino acid requirements reduces nitrogen excretion. Enzyme supplements and probiotics may also improve digestion and reduce ammonia in manure.

6.4 Housing Design
Well-insulated poultry houses with good drainage and properly installed nipple drinkers minimize litter moisture. Preventing condensation on walls and ceilings also helps keep humidity under control.

6.5 Advanced Methods
Technologies like air scrubbers, biofilters, or controlled ozone applications are being tested for large commercial units. Automated environmental control systems that integrate NH₃ and RH sensors with fans and heaters are becoming increasingly popular.

7. Economic Importance
Poor air quality silently eats into farm profits. Lower feed efficiency, reduced weight gain, carcass downgrades, increased mortality, and higher veterinary costs all add up to significant economic losses. Studies show that ammonia-related performance drops can cost large poultry complexes thousands of dollars weekly. Investing in better litter management, ventilation, and nutritional adjustments often proves cost-effective in the long run.

8. Evidence and Case Studies
Field surveys often reveal ammonia exceeding safe levels during winter when ventilation is minimized, leading to higher respiratory issues and welfare concerns. Controlled trials consistently show that birds exposed to even moderate ammonia (20–30 ppm) suffer from lower growth rates, poorer immune response, and more lesions compared to those raised under optimal conditions. Interventions such as litter acidifiers, improved diet formulations, and enhanced ventilation schedules have been shown to significantly reduce ammonia emissions and improve performance.

9. Recommendations for Farmers
– Check RH daily: maintain between 50–70%.
– Monitor ammonia regularly: aim for <20 ppm.
– Fix water leaks immediately to avoid wet litter.
– Adjust ventilation by season to balance temperature, RH, and air quality.
– Work with a nutritionist to optimize protein levels in diets.
– Use litter amendments wisely to reduce ammonia emissions.

10. Future Outlook
The integration of smart sensors and artificial intelligence into poultry housing systems may soon allow farmers to predict ammonia build-up and adjust ventilation automatically. Further research is needed to quantify the long-term welfare and production benefits of advanced technologies and to make them affordable for small- and medium-scale farmers.

11. Conclusion
Ammonia and humidity are closely linked environmental challenges in poultry houses. Both negatively affect bird health, welfare, and productivity when not controlled. Together, they magnify each other’s harmful effects, resulting in economic losses and compromised flock performance. Regular monitoring, proactive litter and ventilation management, balanced nutrition, and modern environmental control tools are essential for maintaining a healthy environment. Addressing these issues not only supports profitability but also improves animal welfare, ensuring sustainable poultry production.

In today’s poultry industry, two factors play a decisive role in ensuring profitable, sustainable, and disease-free production:

Water Treatment and Biosecurity.
Together, they safeguard flock health, enhance performance, and reduce dependence on antibiotics.

1. Water Treatment in Poultry
Water is often called the “forgotten nutrient,” yet it is the most critical element in poultry production. Birds consume twice as much water as feed, and any compromise in water quality directly impacts growth, egg production, and immunity.

Key Challenges in Water Quality
– Microbial contamination: Bacteria such as E. coli and Salmonella spread through untreated water.
– Biofilm formation: Organic residues in pipelines harbor pathogens.
– Chemical impurities: High TDS, hardness, iron, or nitrates affect digestion and performance.
– pH imbalance: Acidic or alkaline water reduces feed intake. Water Treatment Practices
– Filtration to remove physical impurities.
– Acidification to maintain pH (5.5–6.5) and inhibit bacterial growth.
– Chlorination / Hydrogen Peroxide / Ozone for disinfection.
– Regular waterline flushing to prevent biofilm buildup.
– Monitoring TDS, hardness, and microbial load routinely.

2. Biosecurity in Poultry
Biosecurity means preventing disease entry and spread on the farm. With rising concerns about Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) and the push toward antibiotic-free production, biosecurity has become more important than ever.

Three Levels of Biosecurity
1. Conceptual Biosecurity – Farm location, distance from other poultry units, controlled entry points.
2. Structural Biosecurity – Physical barriers, fencing, bird-proof sheds, water sanitation system.
3. Operational Biosecurity – Day-to-day practices like disinfection, vaccination, and visitor control.

Practical Biosecurity Measures
– Restrict farm access (only authorized persons allowed).
– Provide footbaths, hand sanitizers, and farm clothing.
– Disinfect vehicles, crates, and equipment before entry.
– Implement rodent and wild bird control programs.
– Maintain strict mortality disposal methods (incineration/composting).
– Regular vaccination and health monitoring.
– Keep detailed farm records for traceability.

3. Water Treatment + Biosecurity = Sustainable Poultry
While water treatment ensures internal health and performance, biosecurity provides external protection from infections. Both are complementary and essential.
– Clean water reduces gut-related diseases like colibacillosis and diarrhoea.
– Biosecurity reduces the risk of respiratory and viral infections.
– Together, they help in antibiotic-free poultry production, improve FCR (Feed Conversion Ratio), enhance bird welfare, and boost farmer profitability.

Water Quality Monitoring & Water-Borne Diseases in Poultry

Diagram shows that, the source of water we need to check, Ph, TDS, COLOUR, BACTERIA & VIRAL LOAD. This water will go to overhead tank & from there it will distribute to different Poultry shed tanks & through pipe & nipple it will available for birds, here we need to monitor the quality of water.

Importance of Water Sanitation in Poultry Production
In modern poultry production, the use of feed additives such as water and feed acidifiers, toxin binders, probiotics, and antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) is a common recommendation by poultry nutritionists. Farmers are also increasingly incorporating low-cost protein sources like Rice DDGS, Maize DDGS, and Meat Meal (sometimes adulterated with leather powder) to reduce feed costs.

However, ignoring water sanitation remains one of the most critical mistakes in poultry farming. Even with balanced feed formulation and additives, if the water provided to the birds is contaminated, it results in:
• Loose droppings due to microbial contamination.
• Poor nutrient absorption – birds fail to utilize protein, energy, minerals, and vitamins in the diet.
• Increased incidence of diseases such as E. coli infections and Salpingitis.
• Weakened immunity and consequently poor production performance.

In contrast, a farm with proper water sanitation shows remarkable differences. For example, in one of my ideally managed farms, the birds consistently showed dry droppings (“DRY BEAT”), a clear indicator of good gut health and proper nutrient absorption. This success was achieved through:
• Regular water sanitation practices (disinfection, acidification, and monitoring).
• Ensuring feed hygiene along with the use of safe, food-grade raw materials.
• Strict biosecurity and management protocols.

Safe Water Treatment – A Farmer’s Responsibility

Many farmers currently use different chemicals such as chlorine gas, bleaching powder, and sodium hypochlorite for water treatment. They are not safe for poultry or humans. These compounds often leave harmful residues, alter water taste, reduce consumption, and may even add toxic by-products into the water. According to WHO guidelines, only food and pharmaceutical grade salt should be used for drinking water treatment — both for humans and poultry. The safest and globally recommended option is NaDCC (Sodium Dichloroisocyanurate), which ensures:
• Broad spectrum disinfection with very effective bacterial control
• Safe for poultry & human consumption
• No significant change in taste or odour
• Eco-friendly & easy handling
• Stable and longer shelf life compared to other chlorine sources

Using sub-standard chemicals not only compromises poultry performance (loose droppings, poor nutrient absorption, higher
disease load, chlorine toxicity) but also risks human food safety through residues in meat and eggs.
Key Impact: Farmers must understand that safe water treatment is not about the cheapest chemical, but about using WHO- recommended, food & pharma grade NaDCC for long-term health, productivity, and profitability.

Note: Why NaDCC (Food & Pharma Grade) is Always Better.

Among all the available chlorine-base compounds for water sanitation, Food & Pharma grade Sodium Dichloroisocyanurate (NaDCC) is the safest and most effective choice.

• WHO Recommended – Approved for safe drinking water treatment globally.
• Broad Spectrum Effectiveness – Provides strong and stable disinfection (48 hours’ stability).
• Safe for Birds & Humans – No harmful residues, no significant change in taste or odor.
• Eco-Friendly – No toxic by-products or sludge formation.
• Long Shelf Life – Up to 3 years, with easy effervescent tablet formulation.
• Ease of Use – Simple handling, no heavy cylinders or high manpower required.
• Therefore, NaDCC (Food & Pharma Grade) is always better than chlorine gas, bleaching powder, sodium hypochlorite, or halozone for ensuring Zero-Bacteria Water in poultry Farms.

Conclusion
In poultry management, prevention is always better than cure. Poultry farming success is not just about what we feed the birds, but also about the quality of water they drink every single day. Feed can be fortified, sheds can be modernized, but without clean water and strict sanitation, the full genetic potential of the flock can never be realized. Water is the simplest yet most powerful tool to secure healthy birds, higher productivity, and long-term profitability. Water treatment and biosecurity are not costs but investments that return multiple benefits in productivity, profitability, and sustainability.

Dr.Partha P. Biswas
M.Sc.,Ph.D.,F.Z.S.,F.Z.S.I.
Former Asso. Professor & H.O.D.,
Dept. of Zoology, R.K.Mission V.C.College,
Kolkata ,W.Bengal.
Senior Consultant, Aqua-Vet inputs,
Fin-O-Wing Formulations, Kolkata-700084

The chicken industry is becoming more vulnerable to environmental shifts, particularly high temperatures. Open-sided poultry species are susceptible to heat stress, negatively impacting growth and productivity. Factors determining heat stress include temperature radiation, humidity, metabolic rate, age, and duration. Modern commercial broilers are more sensitive to heat stress, making understanding and controlling environmental conditions crucial for poultry production and health. High temperatures in birds reduce antioxidant capacity, requiring food handling and expensive cooling. Understanding and controlling environmental conditions is crucial for poultry production and health.

Thermoregulatory Device in Chicken
Unlike mammals, birds do not have sweat glands, but they have developed a number of behavioral adaptations to cope with heat, including increased breathing rate, panting and raised wings. Commercial poultry prioritize high production, making broilers more sensitive to environmental stresses, and affecting meat quality and immune problems. Under conditions of heat stress, metabolic heat increases, and the animal succumbs to hyperthermia. In summary, it can be concluded that high ambient temperature outside the thermoneutral region during the production phase has a bad effect on meat production, meat quality and causes serious immune problems in broilers.

Heat Shock Proteins of Poultry Birds During Heat Stress
Heat shock proteins (HSPs) are stress proteins found in all living organisms that are activated by high environmental temperatures to protect cells from stressors such as heat. The 70 kDa heat shock proteins (HSP70) are a family of proteins known for their potential role in thermotolerance and widely regarded as cellular thermometers. Over expression of HSP70 has been observed under oxidative stress, leading to mitochondrial reactive oxygen species scavenging and pulmonary endothelial protection against bacterial toxins. They keep cells in order by synthesizing other proteins, attract immune cells and participate in protein assembly and degradation. Higher HSP expression is associated with better heat tolerance and is produced by all living organisms in high temperature environments.

Effects of Heat Stress in Poultry Birds
Reduced voluntary feed intake which affects the functionality of the entire digestive system High environmental temperatures activate the hypothalamus–pituitary axis, brain-gut axis and elevate plasma corticosterone concentrations, affecting the digestive system’s functionality.

This leads to changes in motility, flux patterns, secretory activity, content viscosity and pH Generation of ROS (reactive oxygen species) and the efficacy of the antioxidant defense system deteriorate. Overproduction of ROS in mitochondria can damage proteins, lipids, and DNA Heat stress can impair the feeding process, nutrient absorption and utilization, although water intake increases rapidly Upregulation of adipokines secretion (leptin and adiponectin) and the expression of their receptors can negatively regulate feed intake and calorie consumption thus resulting in decreased metabolic heat production The decline in trypsin, chymotrypsin and amylase (intestinal secretion) due to reduced feed intake often results in impairment of digestive functionality, nutrient digestibility Hypoperfusion and an increase in blood flow to the skin surface occur as an adaptive response of the circulatory system to stabilize blood pressure and promote heat loss It is known that heat challenge has an immune-suppressive effect.

Use of Dietary Phytochemicals to Reduce Heat Stress
Experimental studies on poultry birds suggest phytochemical ingestion may reduce heat stress effects. These phytochemicals can directly or indirectly influence genes and metabolic pathways, with stress reduction linked to antioxidant qualities.

Fig.3: The chicken’s response to being overheated. Chickens raised in high temperatures produce more reactive oxygen species and show signs of immunological inflammation in addition to consuming less food.

Mitigating Heat Stress Using Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate (EGCG), A Secondary Metabolite in Green Tea

Green tea’s most prevalent catechin, EGCG, is thought to be its most bioactive ingredient and possesses potent antioxidant properties. The primary cause of heat stress-induced oxidative stress in poultry is damage to tissues and cells, which is mostly manifested in an increase in MDA (malondialdehyde) concentration in such tissues and cells. It has been demonstrated that adding the polyphenol EGCG to broilers housed in thermoneutral environments may increase their antioxidant capacity. Acutely heat-stressed broilers may have greater antioxidant capacity and less oxidative damage in their muscles because EGCG may activate the Nrf2 signaling pathway.

Reducing Heat Stress in Broiler Chickens With Additional Ginger (Zingiber Officinale) and Onion (Allium Cepa)

Onion and its derivatives including saponins, aglycones, quercetin, cepaenes, flavonoids, organosulfurs, and phenolic compounds showed various pharmacological properties and therapeutic effects.When broilers are heat stressed, the combination of onion and ginger supplements increases the nutrition of the groups more than no supplementation.

According to research results, growth performance, carcass quality, antioxidant levels and immune system response of broilers are improved when fed 10 g of ginger and and 2.5 g of onion during heat stress. Ginger contains substances with powerful antibacterial and antioxidant properties, including chagaol, ginger diol and ginger diol. Ginger (2%) added to broilers suffering from heat stress significantly improved blood biochemical parameters and growth indicators compared to the control group.

Seeds of Black Cumin (Nigella Sativa) improve Bird’s Ability to Live in Heat-stressed Conditions

Black cumin seeds have been shown to have pharmacological and antibacterial properties and also contain drug-like compounds. The volatile oil (0.4-0.45%) contains saturated fatty acids, which include: nigellone, which is the only component of the carbonyl fraction. oil, thymoquinone (TQ), thymohydroquinone (THQ), dithymoquinone, thymol, carvacrol, α and β-pinene, d-limonene, d-citronellol, carvacrol, t-anethole, 4-terpineol and longifolin etc. Thymoquinone improves hatchability, pos-thatching performance and antioxidant activity of thermally stressed broiler embryos. Black cumin extract has been shown in trials to reduce serum MDA levels and protect against oxidative stress.

Hot Red Pepper (HRP) Reduces Heat Exhaustion in Birds

Ascorbic acid, or vitamin C, is abundant in capsaicin, a terpenoid found in HRP that helps prevent heat exhaustion in birds. Carotenoids, which are rich in vitamins E, C, and provitamin A (beta carotene), are known to have powerful antioxidant qualities that help prevent the damaging effects of free radicals and, in certain situations, oxidative stress, which can lead to cell death in broilers. Furthermore, it has been found that adding capsaicin, an active ingredient in red pepper that is present in grill feed at a dose of 50 mg/kg, can lessen the harmful effects of heat stress.

Moringa (Moringa Oleifera)helps to Survive Birds Under Heat Stress

Moringa leaves contain high levels of total polyphenols (260mg/100g), b-carotene (34mg/100g), kaempferol (34mg/100g), quercetin (100mg/100g), as well as a total antioxidant capacity of 260mg/100g. Kaempferol and quercetin are the flavonoids present in moringa leaves and possess strong antioxidants. It has been found that 0.3% incorporation of M. oleifera leaf meal improves the performance and physiological parameters of broilers and also helped the birds survive under heat stress.

THYME (THYMUS VULGAIS) Protects Chicks Against Heat Stress

The two most important bioactive compounds in this plant are carvacrol and thymol, which may be the primary source of thyme’s pharmacological actions. Thus research has identified linalool, thymol, carvacrol, gamma-terpineol, and geraniol as the primary components of thyme. Dietary thyme essential oil (150–200 mg/kg) is more effective at shielding chicks from the harmful effects of heat stress while also enhancing immunological function and development performance. One material that may be able to improve growth in broilers located in hot climates is thyme oil.

Coriander (Coriandrum Sativum) Seed in Ameliorating the Impact of Thermal Challenges

According to research, broilers under heat stress that are fed 2% coriander seed have higher feed intake, weight gain, reduced panting, and higher levels of corticosterone. The broilers’ poor intestinal absorptive capacity and shape may be connected to the rise in corticosterone levels during stress. Furthermore, according to a different study, adding 2% coriander to the diet helps broiler birds by lessening the effects of heat shock. The supplement, according to the author, benefitted broilers that were experiencing heat stress and enhanced their blood parameters, immunity, and overall performance.

Cinnamon (Cinnamomum Zeylanicum) Powder as Antioxidant in Thermally Challenged Birds

The common herbal plant, cinnamon contains different active phenolic compounds, which include flavones, catechin, isoflavones, flavonoids and other phenolics. The main bioactive constituent of cinnamon is cinnamaldehyde. The phenolic components function as antioxidants and can effectively scavenge ROS. Cinnamon supplements help in homeostasis due to the reduced pH caused by heat stress. It has also been reported that an increase in the activity of CAT, total antioxidant capacity and SOD and a decrease in the MDA when birds were placed in a thermally challenged environment during their finishing phase.

Turmeric (Curcuma Longa) for Heat-stressed Broilers

The yellowish pigments of turmeric, namely demethoxycurcumin, curcumin, and bisdemethoxycurcumin, are commonly referred to as curcumoids. Curcuminoids are an antioxidative compound found in turmeric. Researchers have shown the effects of turmeric powder supplement at 0.3 and 0.6 g/kg when administered to birds under heat stress. The superoxide radicals are neutralized, and there is an increase in the activity of SOD and CAT (ROS-removing enzymes or antioxidant enzymes ) and a decrease in MDA in broilers. The increased level in MDA indicates oxidative damage in liver of heat stressed broilers.

Conclusion
Heat stress can hurt poultry birds by making them grow slower, weakening their immune system, causing intestinal inflammation, and causing other health problems. It can also trigger oxidative process. But using natural substances called phytogenic compounds can help chickens who are raised in hot conditions.But more research is needed to understand the molecular changes made by medicinal herbs and the interactions between their active components, gut microbiota, and gut barriers. By using these approaches, we can improve chicken welfare and make poultry production more sustainable and efficient.